FLINT—Eight days after entering the world, Khi’Meir Taylor made another debut — this time in what could be a national spotlight.

Wednesday was the first day of a $55 million experiment to test whether cash payments can protect children from the toxic stress of poverty.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Calling it now: They’ll find that it works, but then nothing will change once the experiment concludes. Bought and paid for politicians will protect the wealthiest instead of allowing the poor enough to get by, doing everything they can to prevent UBI from being widely implemented.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You kind of need to help pay for it by getting rid of government programs to allocate money piecemeal. That’s a huge change and a huge commitment, and politicians aren’t good at that.

      …. Although I don’t know why the libertarian and other small government folk haven’t latched onto that opportunity

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You need to do way more than that. In addition to canceling pretty much every entitlement, you still need more money to give everyone a check.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Really, we already have the results. And they’re good results. Every single resident of Alaska gets oil dividends. I don’t like that it’s how they have a UBI, but it does give them one and it does help. The only problem is that the amount entirely depends on the oil revenue generated by Alaskan oil in any given year.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Agreed.

      I only wish it weren’t a state or local-level thing. If we can find hundreds of billions for other countries’ wars, in my mind, there’s no excuse for UBI not being the law at the federal level.

      • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same, although I do understand that at the moment, it’s only a local or state level thing because it’s still in its early stages. I feel like once enough states or cities experiment then we can gather all that data to create a national system based off what works and find ways to limit abuses on the system.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    to test whether cash payments can protect children from the toxic stress of poverty

    The answer is yes. Obviously.

    I keep seeing these pilot programs and small experiments in UBI, and they all prove that people prosper and thrive more when they have more money. Nobody is surprised. Was that ever even in question?

    I want to see UBI experiments, plans, etc. that tackle large-scale implementation. We’ve proven “BI”; that was never the hard part. We need to focus on the “U”.