“Now how many of y’all think BoBo gonna try to convince us that polls don’t matter… of course unless they are trash for Biden & great for Trump!”

Who speaks like this?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nah, we’re taking y’all back as a gender neutral replacement for “you guys”

    I use it in a professional setting now even.

    Strangely, it keeps everyone happy, no one has ever object to y’all and it’s grammatically perfect.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s actually a significant flaw in English that there’s no generally accepted 2nd person plural pronoun. There’s probably another language in the same boat but I’m not aware of one personally.

      Currently in the running are:

      • Y’all (favored in the south)
      • Yous (favored in the north, particularly the northeast)
      • And the somewhat awkward “you all”, the only one that’s officially correct

      For anyone who speaks a language other than English the missing pronoun is a pretty glaring thing.

      • Gumby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s also “you guys” if you use “guys” as gender-neutral, since there’s no particularly good feminine version of “guys”. There’s just “gals”, which sounds incredibly old fashioned, or “girls”, which sounds totally condescending when talking about adult women, or maybe “ladies”.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        English is a terrible language, and I say that as a native speaker.

        It’s a language from an isolated island that only the lower class spoke for centuries. For generations English royalty didn’t even speak English.

        So the commoners just did whatever they wanted with it.

        It why we use English words for livestock, but when someone eats it, we use French.

        The people who could speak English were the ones raising the animals, not eating them.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It why we use English words for livestock, but when someone eats it, we use French.

          The people who could speak English were the ones raising the animals, not eating them.

          This is amusing but I’m not sure it’s accurate. Even in French (or other Latin languages) the words differ.

          Vache = Boeuf
          Cochon = Porc
          Poule = Poulet (as in English, chicken is the same)

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            There is an element of truth to what he said, but of course the reality is a lot more complicated. Generally the more low class and common a word is, the more likely it is to derive from Germanic, while the “fancier” a word is the more likely to come from French or some other language. E.G. mother and father derive from Proto-Germanic, while a word like mayor is derived from Latin by way of Old French.

            English is still an absolute trainwreck of a language though. It’s a thousand years of just kind of winging it in terms of grammar and vocabulary. It started as essentially a creole and then outlived both the languages it spawned from as well as just absorbing whatever random words and languages it bumped into along the way.

            Most other languages at least went through an overhaul or two along the way to clean up their worst eccentricities, but any attempts at “fixing” English over the years have been partial attempts at best and mostly just made things worse. In particular the current state of spelling in English is just the absolute worst with nearly all the rules being utterly arbitrary and just kind of randomly slapped together over the years.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ireland uses ‘ye’. There are multiple Hibernian English phrases or words that are just direct translations from Irish, which has second person plural, although the grammatical structure is different.

        In Dublin, they often use ‘youse’, but it’s more slang than accepted. Ye is still seen as not entirely correct but is commonplace enough in everyday speech to be more than slang.

    • norbert@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I see some stickers sometimes that says “Ya’ll means you all” and I love it.

    • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      come on, the Scottish/north english “yous” is better than Y’all, and yous cant deny it!