• halva@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      142
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      ah yes posting “le gay bad” memes in response to a dictator who made the lives of queer people in the country he controls an actual hell

      go back to fuckin r/conservative with that shit

      • MelastSB@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        118
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m pretty sure you misunderstood. Putin doesn’t like gays, so depicting him as one is bad. Doesn’t mean gays are bad

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          4 months ago

          Most people understand that. But I don’t want to be associated with Putin even as a joke. Fuck him, he doesn’t deserve the honor of even being depicted as gay.

          I’m not saying no one can make this joke, but it seems kinda lazy and relies too much on stereotypes to be funny imo

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s not lazy and it’s not supposed to be funny. The point is that he doesn’t like the image. It’s a big fuck you to Putin.

            • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Again, I understand the point is that he doesn’t like the image. My point is that there is more than one way to interpret the image, and they’re not all positive. And when some one points that out, they’re downvoted and mocked.

              I say it’s lazy because I’ve been hearing people call straight people gay since elementary school. To piss them off. I don’t see how this is much different even if the intent was to criticize his homophobia. The effect is still the same

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Also makes your question how accepted LGBT people actually are in the West, even among “liberals”, if this is what they think an insult is.

                It reads as “Being gay is fine and good so long as you support our positions; but the minute you start opposing us, we will use your sexual identity as a weapon against you. Remember that.”

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              He doesn’t care about the image, and it is incredibly delusional to pretend that such a depiction has any significance to anyone but terminally online and chronically underemployed white Americans under 40.

              Also, it is homophobic. If there is nothing wrong with being gay and crossdressing, then it is bigoted to portray our enemies as such as an insult.

              Being gay isn’t an insult. Crossdressing isn’t an insult. Being trans isn’t an insult. Depicting Putin as such isn’t an insult.

              All this does is further stigma against LGBT persons in the West. Is that your goal? Because that’s what is being done. And, ironically, it serves to further a goal that Putin supports - the increased stigmatization of LGBT life. You’re doing his work for him and are too narrow-minded to even realize it

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The humour hits when you imagine how pissed off Putin would be about this image. Then you get to laugh again at his feeble attempt to ban an image on the intent when you learn about that part.

            • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah I can see how that’s funny. And I get the irony of the picture. I personally think it’s not in good taste, but I’m not trying to yuck anyone’s yum or cancel someone’s humor. Just explain why some of us don’t like it and try to understand why so many people downvoted the original person who disagreed.

              It really seems to be getting more divisive and less welcoming on Lemmy the longer I’m here

              • kense@lmmy.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                It really seems to be getting more divisive and less welcoming on Lemmy the longer I’m here

                Never tolerate intolerance.
                If you don’t like people making fun of a dictator on a massive killing/kidnapping spree, this place is most definitely not for you…

                • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  What?? That’s the weirdest way to twist my words I’ve seen. Please, make fun of him. I don’t tolerate his bigotry.

                  I’m saying there are good ways and bad ways to make fun of him. Some people, including me, think this isn’t the best way to do it. Some people think it is. But yeah, maybe this place isn’t for me. It’s becoming too much like reddit imo

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Theyre using homophobia to mock a dictator. Which is still homophobia.

                  Using racism to depict Xi as a stereotypical Chinaman would still be racism, even if he is a dictator. Using antisemitic caricatures to depict Netanyahu as inherently untrustworthy would be antisemitic even if he is running a genocide with US weapons.

                  Stereotypes and slurs don’t become acceptable just because they’re used against our enemies. This image of Putin should be banned and any posts containing it should be removed under hate speech and anti-homophobia rules

            • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s not illegal to be a man anywhere in the world. There’s a deep sense of community with lgbt+ because it is, and has been, a struggle for most gay people. So when someone takes a photo of the very person who is discriminating against our community and makes it look like he’s a part of the community, it can hit a sore spot with some people.

              Again, I’m not trying to tell people to stop and I get that some people see it differently. But every time I’ve seen someone post that image, someone will say how that image can be interpreted as being gay is a joke, or that saying someone is gay when they’re not is bad form. And everyone dog piles and mocks them or calls them sensitive, etc. I’m mostly disappointed that it’s the same here and most people don’t care to hear a different perspective

              • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m tired of hearing people cry about being offended from every little thing. You’re literally being offended right now by a drag queen gay looking mockup of Putin, that Putin banned because it pisses him off. Grow some skin.

                • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  And there it is. I knew someone would say that. If you see me as a crying offended sjw with thin skin, then there’s no point in having this conversation. I laid out my differing perspective without being harsh or judgemental, all while feeling no offense.

                  Personally I’m tired of the right wing talking points that dismiss any different perspective as weak. I’m tired of communities like Lemmy becoming more divisive, with users seeing each other as enemies and not giving others the benefit of the doubt. I’m tired of typing out long comments that I put thought into, hoping people will respond like decent humans, and getting brain dead insults and defensive arguments.

                  I’ll make a deal with you, I’ll grow thicker skin if you grow some empathy.

          • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sharing a sexuality doesn’t associate you with him any more than sharing a hair color or preference of fabric softener

            • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              But that’s the thing, I’m not sharing a sexuality with him. Someone made him look like a gay stereotype because he hates people like me.

              And the whole point is the picture IS to associate him with the LGBT+ community, in an ironic way, to piss him off.

              If he made being blonde illegal and threw blondes in jail, that would be a fair analogy. But he didn’t, so that’s a terrible analogy. I mean, there are people that discriminate based on appearance and they’re called racists. So if this was a picture of Trump but photoshopped to look stereotypically Chinese, maybe that would be more of an equivalent analogy

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, yet unmentioned, Putin’s government BANNED use of that Putin in drag image because it hurt his sensitive ego.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not “le gay bad”, but more-so the idea of turning Putin into a gay icon in direct opposition to his identity politics.

  • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    In East Germany the people loved their nation most only weeks before collapse: 99,92% voted for the pro-soviet government.

    Then the CIA dropped 20 million agents from invisible helicopters which fakes mass demonstrations and used mind-control rays to make them love the west and hate the soviet union.

    In the first election after reunification the Communists got 11,1% of all votes in Former East Germany. Damned CIA mind control rays.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is my favorite tankie cope.

      “The CIA obviously staged the protests and rigged the election against the communists!”

      So like, they snuck in millions of undercover agents?

      “Don’t be ridiculous, that’s not how it works!”

      So they stuffed the ballot box?

      “No, that’s what we tried to do.”

      You mean they forced people to vote at gunpoint?

      “NO IT WAS THE PROPAGANDA.”

      So the CIA just… Convinced people to support Western politics?

      “IT’S NOT FAIR! HOW CAN WE WIN IF PEOPLE HAVE AGENCY!”

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      There aint no mind control rays.

      CIA sucked off commies into a democracy.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        He even was one when he didn‘t run for office. Hell most people don‘t even remember the name of Russia‘s other „President“ they had for 5 years. I for sure don‘t.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think everyone knows the name, he’s kinda (in) famous lately with all the talk about nuking Europe and stuff. It’s Medvedev.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      When they decide they should be the president until they die and make it legal. Putin has reached that milestone a while ago.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Constitution of Russia was adopted in 1993, limiting the President of Russia to no more than two consecutive four year terms. Boris Yeltsin was the incumbent president when the constitution came into effect and had already served for over two years. Yelstin was reelected in 1996, but he resigned near the end of his term in 1999, and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin served for the remainder of Yeltsin’s term as acting president. Putin was elected to a full term in 2000 and reelected in 2004.

        Putin was not constitutionally permitted to run for reelection in 2008, so he endorsed First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, who went on to become the next president. The day after Medvedev’s inauguration, he appointed Putin as Prime Minister of Russia. While Putin did not hold the office of president for the following four years, he held de facto control over the country’s executive, extending his tenure beyond what term limits would normally allow.

        The Constitution was amended in 2008, expanding the presidential term from four to six years following the 2012 election. Having been removed from the office of the presidency for a term, Putin was constitutionally eligible to run again and was elected president in 2012 and then reelected in 2018. The Constitution was amended in 2020 to reset the number of terms Putin has served, allowing him to circumvent term limits in the 2024 and 2030 elections, enabling him to legally stay in office until 2036.

        So I guess he first broke the rules in 2004 if you count his time as acting president, but I think it’s no longer up for debate after 2008.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I wouldn’t count the part where he was acting president instead of Yeltsin, but yeah, since 2008 he’s stopped being sneaky about wanting to be a dictator.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      When you have nothing left to gain from acting like their friend?

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s a lot of people on .ml, Hexbear and Lemmygrad that are probably celebrating right now.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, that is unacceptable discourse! You may disagree strongly with them, but by dehumanizing them with such statements you prove yourself no better than them. They are not animals or things, they are people with very different views, with emphasis on people.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            yes but we need to ackowledge them as people. Because no matter how much their views disgust us they’re still built of the same flesh and blood as we are, they are a warning, to you and people around you, to not fall into the same ideological trap as they did. If you just consider them “not human” you put yourself at risk of following their steps.

            All the cruel people in history we call monsters were humans. It’s an unnerving thought to share any likness with them, but it’s important we remember that nobody is born evil

  • dezmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    88 just happens to be a Nazi reference used by white supremacists. Curious coincidences.

    • NotAtWork@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      This time it might actually be a coincidence, someone at the political bureau tried to pick the closest number to 100 that wouldn’t look made up, 73 they were promptly excited for sedition my their boss who added 3 to the number and routed it to his boss,. Repeat the process 5 times and there you go “88”.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wasn’t the previous one somewhere in the 90-ish percent? This is a huge loss!

        • RatBin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I made a joke about that percentage the day before this farce – I can’t call them elections – but I never thought that would become a reality. Secondly, are we going to accept ‘‘elections’’ held in a territory occupied by military forces. Nobody should be that naive.

          • Chr0nos1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I agree with you, the entire thing was a farce. There’s no way he LEGITIMATELY got 88% of the vote. Just another dictator, doing dictator things.

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just want to point out here that this is what many Trump voters are hoping for. If you’re a US citizen, please vote in November.

    • OftenWrong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ve been pushing “both options suck so why bother” rhetoric really hard too. They know they can’t get people to vote for trump so their best bet is to get them not to vote

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Australia solved this. We have to vote.
        They also made it easy to vote - our main voting day is always a Saturday If you won’t be able to vote on that day for some reason, there are small polling places open for a couple of weeks ahead of that date.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you won’t be able to vote on that day for some reason, there are small polling places open for a couple of weeks ahead of that date.

          For the record, early voting is an option in many US states, too, and it’s really expanded since COVID. In my state, you could go to any poll location to cast an early vote. It used to be you could only cast an early vote if you were going to be away from home in election day for a specific reason (college or military are the ones I remember, but there were other reasons, too), but it’s expanded so pretty much anyone can do early voting now. On election day, you have to go to your assigned poll location in order to vote if you don’t do early voting.

          This varies by state, though. In any case, it’s getting easier to vote, and there are more options to be able to vote, but it’s not nationwide (yet, hopefully).

          • Nath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is fantastic to hear. Now, you just need to be able to vote at any elementary school and get your democracy sausage and you’ll be voting like the professionals!

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not (the sausage thing seems to imply you are), but all public schools (elementary, middle, and high school) are closed on election day so that they can act as polling locations. Many libraries also act as polling locations on election day.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It sure would make it harder for them if both options didn’t indeed suck. Biden is light years better than Trump, but he’s still pretty much shit.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    even in a rigged election that stupid cunt isn’t able to achieve over 90%. what an absolute worthless sucker!

    Fast forward to the point where you put an end to your miserable life you russian fuck and finally relieve us from your existence!

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you’re rigging an election, it can be better politically to give yourself 65% of the vote than 97% of the vote.

      97% is obviously fake. 65% is easier to make people beleive in.

    • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      that is because you cringe KAMARAD russians are most intelligent, much more than african dictators 88% for most glorious president of russia and 22% for president’s prime minister That way we can lie to people about opposition being very close to glorious president ideas

        • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well standard election story mode is 100% completion but the extra 10% is finding all hidden hammer & sickle icons and Collectables in every level.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The soviet education system was famed… but it’s been about thirty years and most of the academics fled a while back.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      WDYM, they’ve likely just drawn the numbers.

      At this point nobody is seriously trying to get some data from them (that they pretend to give openly, the last time these were text on a webpage with scripts and WOFF fonts used for obfuscation - like the letter “a” is in fact “+” and so on ; people used OCR for that, there were “anomalies”).

      There’s a meme percentage in Russian-speaking web - 146%, that’s what once made it to TV for some voting district.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah, that 12% is left for the satellite parties to test the waters for Putin. The satellite parties can fail freely, without affecting the popularity of Putin.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I dare you to scroll these comments until you find a hexbear CCP cuck insulting the “liberal west”, it’ll be a fun 20 seconds.

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        .ml, too? That one is pretty sus.

        How can we request defederation?

        And what is stopping all the bad ru actors from just joining and infiltrating .world anyway?

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Tankie” and “subtlety” do not go together. They’re pretty easy to spot even when they hide on other instances.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          .ml’s still federated. I’m guessing that people are reluctant to defederate the instance run by the Lemmy devs. People will probably start cutting ties when Sublinks hits the scene.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            That and there are unfortunately and very sadly a number of not insignificant open source projects that have a significant communities there. Though it might be better to rip the Band-Aid off now than to continue to let it fester and grow.