• weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    I work on electronics and woodworking and Phillips are the utter worst of both of them. The thread lock in computers makes them easy to strip when unscrewing. The resistance of driving them into wood makes them guaranteed to strip when screwing. Fuck them.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The big issue I see with people driving Phillips screws is that they don’t use a large enough driver size. Computer screws for example are Phillips #2 and I’ve never had an issue with them stripping.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use the correct driver, I’ll go through my kit to find the best fitting bit. It simply comes down to the fact they are designed to strip to avoid “catastrophic failure”. Plus the fact that companies use intentionally cheap, soft screws, to make repair and service harder. Cough cough zinc screws on a $10,000 iMac (steel screws would have cost 25 cents for 10, zinc like 5 cents for 10, fucking ridiculous).

        • evergreen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I read that the thing about them being designed to strip to prevent worse failure is just a myth. Or at least they weren’t originally designed to. It said that the original patent never contained any feature for that. Wouldn’t surprise me though if modern companies do use screws designed to strip to prevent disassembly/repair.

          • HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think originally the screws would cause the driver to cam out and stop driving if a certain amount of force is applied but the screws are so soft and cheap that the harder driver damages the screw head when it cams out.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              This and the centered shape that Philips and Robertson have were key. The lack of a sharp driver bit being able to slip out of the fastener prevented a lot of injuries.

              However, Philips, at least, needs to go away.

        • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I always figured it was intentional but for the other reason: screws soft enough that overtightening can’t damage/crack the multi-thousand dollar components, the screw head cores out first.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s great, but then you can’t get your multi-thousand dollar component unscrewed anyway so what was the point?

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s also a design flaw that it’s so easy to use the wrong sized driver and it will sorta work. It might be annoying that you have to have a set of different star drive or hex drive bits, but you’re less likely to strip them.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Could be that it’s not a Philips but a JIS. I didn’t even know that JIS existed until a couple years ago. The shape is close enough to Philips to mostly work but make it super easy to strip.