• ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    And rightly so, for they have been failed. You can’t even GO TO SCHOOL without concern that you’ll be killed in a mass shooting. This was never a concern for my generation. In 1992, when I graduated, the thought that going to school could be an extinction event for you was not even conceivable. This shouldn’t be an ongoing concern for any generation, yet here we are, sending our kids off to school every morning, knowing that there’s a slim chance they might not come back.

    It’s driving me crazy. But when the whole world’s gone mad, how can you be sure you’re insane?

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I graduated in 1997, in a rural town, and I can say that we’ve knives that caused some injuries and scares and while we did have a kid that brought his dad’s handgun to school and threatened people with it, didn’t shoot anyone thankfully. This type of shit was around even in the 90’s just not around the world and in the 24 hour news like it is now, remember we had Columbine just a few years after we graduated in 1999.

      This shit’s been bad for a while now.

  • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We have every right to be pissed off. I followed every rule you’re supposed to follow. And I’m still worried about retiring in the future. The system is fucking stupid. At my job, every system I implement or touch can be changed. Change is a part of life. But for some fucking reason, this country can’t change shit. We just sit in it as everything gets worse while everyone who is struggling continues to struggle even more. The rich get richer. America blows.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      We just sit in it as everything gets worse

      Democrats make things better. Vote more democrats in, more things get more better.

      For example, under Biden, the wealth gap between the poorest and the richest is now closing for the first time in almost 100 years. Yes, that’s cold comfort to the middle class, but it shouldn’t be. It’s the start of a trend and we need to see it through.

        • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve voted in every local and national election as soon as I turned 18. Protested in George Floyd protests. I’m 30 now. Shit takes way too long.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Protesting is for you to feel good. Unless you’re protesting for civil rights and being arrested for breaking an unjust law.

            If you want to influence the process, you should volunteer for a candidate’s campaign and forget protests. Sorry, but it’s the truth.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              While I generally agree with you, protesting has a place. Protesting alone is useless, but protests in concert with working for concrete policy changes is a force multiplier.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not surprising, the power structures keep deviating from the will of people in many cases, or use people as useful idiots for keeping assholes in power.

    People like Trump have never won a popular vote in the U.S., and don’t win in the U.S. without gerrymandering.

    Moreover, the poverty and misery of immigrants is often exploited to create a “beast” class of citizenry that is then used to create disgust and contempt in others, which is the formula being used in Europe. A lot of these power maintaining strategies are expertly crafted by Harvard/MIT/Ivy League educated sociopaths and psychopaths. People deserve better.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Professional certifications don’t transfer outside specific countries, and her profession is also very language-oriented so she would have to be absolutely fluent in the language of whatever country we went to. That basically leaves England, New Zealand, or Australia as the only options, and only if she decided to spend months and months doing nothing but studying to pass the boards.

        Once we are getting closer to retirement, though, then we will start looking.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not young, but I feel the same way as these young people. I don’t care about this country, I don’t care about its people, and I don’t care about its future. It’s like that Bob Dylan song, “I used to care, but things have changed.”

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I care about its people. I always care about people. Just some people need to be rescued from their hate filled delusion. It’s sad to see these poor suckers get tricked into being angry about things that have absolutely nothing to do with them. Talking about conservative media and how all it does is lash out against things. I don’t even think there is ryhme or reason to it. It is as if they offer up a topic and open the floor to anyone who has some minor complaint.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      GLYY18qWwAAb7pj

      Each successive generation has a higher income even accounting for inflation

          • webadict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Repeat same talking point.

            The things you say are useless, especially since these are adjusted by household size. Do one that isn’t.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Repeat same talking point.

              I’m not saying I agree with them, but they are the only ones providing actual data. Everyone else, including you, is just attacking and downvoting them. I would be interested in hearing an actual argument, but to accuse them of just “repeating a talking point” while they provide data and you provide nothing but a talking point is ridiculously hypocritical.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Their data is adjusted for family size. Family size has been consistently shrinking since the 1960s, which, if you adjust their graph, will lead to overall decrease in wages throughout time. It is a meaningless method of transformation to get data that supports a false narrative.

                Why did you not point out that their data is transformed when I did?

      • yuri@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And people can’t afford houses, college, healthcare, etc. because…? Like cool chart, but my generation will literally never be as financially stable as those who came before. I guess it’s fun to pretend we’re better off than we are though.

        Imagine paying for college with your income rather than loans.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          People can afford more things now than the previous generation

          There are things that increased in price faster, like college. But that’s offset by other things that didn’t increase as fast, like fuel. There are other things that got cheaper, like computers and phones. You’re cherry picking the things that got more expensive, but those are not 100% of a person’s expenses

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s fun that tvs and computers got cheaper, but housing and food are through the roof.

            It’s cool that I can buy a laptop for 500$ dollars, but it’s a one time purchase that we can live without.

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah and look 2 years back on your same graph and see the big 11% in one month.

                And let’s not forget that this is multiplicative. So these months/years with high inflation are still felt today even if the inflation is relatively normal.

                But you are disingenuous in your arguments, while accusing others of doing that same thing.

                So kindly fuck off

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s in line with the inflation numbers. Food costs did not outpace inflation in any significant way

      • littletranspunk@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay now do one that shows how much is available after paying for things like rent, food, car, etc.

        Meaningless chart

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of the average US home was $11,000.00

        How many minimum wage workers are out there right now looking to buy a new home?

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So, you agree, people were able to buy a house on minimum wage in the past and can’t do that today?

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re deliberately ignoring what I actually wrote. Two high school grads working minimum wage jobs in 1960 could have been homeowners in about five years. There are hundreds of reasons why the ownership rate was lower in the past.