Also mistaken for fulgurite by the more naturalistically minded, apparently. Maybe most common in the Nordics, based on viking references?
Additional links:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/100810-thor-thors-hammer-viking-graves-thunderstones-science
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukonvaaja [Finnish]
Looks suspiciously phallic? Ritual of fertility it is
Whops I replied to the wrong comment
I love listening to researchers talk about places like Ur and Karahan Tepe and all the things we know about in between.
What I don’t love is the very clear tendency to believe that people 10,000 years ago had the mental capacity of a frog.
No, I don’t think the pit-like dwellings that don’t have roofs were proof they were savages who lived under the open sky, I think in the TEN THOUSAND YEARS SINCE THEN the roof disintegrated. It’s not a hard concept to put something over your head to stay out of the rain.
It IS however, hard to make a roof out of mud unless you know where to get special mud and how to cook it. They would have to use branches, leaves and long grasses to keep rain off, which definitely wouldn’t survive 10 millennia.
So DID they have roofs? No idea, but trying to point at lack of roofs as “proof” of anything is kind of dumb.
Respect for the ones that straight up say “we don’t know but it’s speculated that…” though
Also it’s disgusting to me how many times I’ve seen “because the people who found the artifact thought it was heretical/sacreligious/proves their religion wrong they destroyed most of it”
Pretty sure they had roofs some 10k years ago.
The oldest evidence of structures is from 476 000 years ago.
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/zambia-worlds-oldest-wooden-structure-2367672
Pretty sure they had roofs some 10k years ago.
The oldest evidence of structures is from 476 000 years ago.
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/zambia-worlds-oldest-wooden-structure-2367672
deleted by creator
It’s amazing to put into perspective how long both bronze and stone ages really took, especially compared to modernity. Human brains are not good at imagining large quantities or intervals, so it was all kinda smushed up into a folder labeled “past” in my head
To give some numbers, the last period of the stone age (Neolithic) lasted around 2000 years and the bronze age around 1600 years. No wonder they “forgot” what the stone age tools were.
Someone pointed a temperature gun (for Covid testing) at me and for a brief moment, I forgot what they were.
When they’re uncovered 100 years from now, they’ll think we shot lasers at each other.
When they’re uncovered 100 years from now, they’ll think we shot lasers at each other.
Don’t we though?
Yeah but they’re lazers, totally different.
leminal.space
lol, I love that instance name
Kurzgesagt did this video where they crammed all of Earth’s history in an hour. Basically you look at a barren wasteland for most of the time until life finally goes macroscopic and then all of humanity happens in less than a second
I sat through the whole thing and it’s still incomprehensible
It’s gotten so fast that we now see significant changes in our lifetimes - cultural, technology, climate. For most of human history, it took many generations for any real change to occur.
Japan might be the record holder for fastest significant change, though. Feudalism to a modern industrial economy in a few decades.
