Amazon (AMZN.O) is planning a major revamp of its decade-old money-losing Alexa service to include a conversational generative AI with two tiers of service and has considered a monthly fee of around $5 to access the superior version, according to people with direct knowledge of the company’s plans.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fortunately, there are solutions to each of those:

        • phones - alternative Android ROMs and fdroid
        • cars - remove the connectivity module
        • TVs - don’t let it access your network and don’t use the apps

        That’s not true for Alexa, you need to allow it to spy for its core functionality to work.

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeap I’m just saying it’s sadly all too common

          I’m actually degoogling at the moment precisely because of all this

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Between inserting ads into Amazon Video, scaling back on fast delivery, and this it looks like Amazon has maxed out their growth and are scaling back on their loss leaders that were used to get where they are.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    People are missing the point. This was ALWAYS the plan. Get Alexa in hundreds of thousands of homes and get everyone to used to using it. Than charge money.

    Even if only a quarter of the users pay, they’ll make a ton of money.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I see you are using than when you should be using then.

      • Then is for time, similar to when. “Back then”
      • Than is for comparisons. “I have more than you”
  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Two things:

    • our alexa units are fine. We manage a half-dozen bulbs and a set-top box.
    • if they want a subscription to keep doing that, HomeAssistant becomes the top job on the queue.

    That’s it.

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d pay $20 or $30 a year, especially if it meant they’d actually, like, improve the service (which has been almost 100% the same for me for the last 4 years or so).

    But $60 to $120 would make me move elsewhere

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Alexa was never supposed to make money by itself. It was supposed to do two things, collect information and lower the barrier to buying things.

    They must have either collected enough data to lower the value of collecting any more, or they have realized that people got over the novelty of asking Alexa to order more dog food.

    My guess is the latter, because buying anything from Amazon now requires 15 minutes of research to make sure it’s actually what you want and not at some ridiculous marked up price. I wouldn’t trust Alexa to pick the best result on the first try.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Alexa has a tendency to give you the ‘featured’ product no matter how precisely and specifically you ask her for something. Even if you don’t have to research and know exactly what you want, it’s almost always easier to just go find your phone.

      The real game changer for Alexa was always having a voice assistant that you can integrate with just about whatever you want that isn’t tied to someone’s phone. The idea of going into someone’s house and just saying ‘Alexa, turn on the kitchen lights’ or ‘Alexa, is it cold outside?’ is where the Alexa magic lies, but Amazon never could figure out how to make that profitable on it’s own, just doesn’t contribute to the business case.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Amazon never could figure out how to make that profitable on it’s own

        They are so dumb. Every house could use their products, they just need to charge normal prices. Everyone has light switches in every room. Imagine if most new houses came with “Alexa” switches and electric plugs.

        They tried to make money on a few hobbyists who could set it up for themselves. They needed to go after the construction market. Charge half of what they were charging and sell a ton to every house in America. It’s not an iPhone. It’s a basic device to turn on the lights.

        • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re right that is a real loss. Really, an Alexa that didn’t require a personalized amazon account could still be huge if they could figure out how not to have to justify the costs of running the servers. I think that unwillingness to let Alexa be just a voice assistant is the key roadblock. In a similar vein, Alexa for business could have been a really big deal too if they could have worked it out a bit faster but now I think interest has mostly died out before it had a chance to be adopted.

          I’m not a huge fan of the company and I think it’s a coin flip as to whether they would just completely screw it up, but I wonder what would have happened if someone like Crestron had taken a real interest instead of just half-assing an integration.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Imagine if most new houses came with “Alexa” switches and electric plugs.

          Oh boy a bunch of added expense to get the light switches swapped out with ones that don’t spy on me.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re right, but the reason that hasn’t caught on is that talking to your “smart” house is stupid. You can’t possibly program every possible command or situation, and telling Alexa to dim the lights in your kitchen to 40% is slower than using a dimmer switch. Actual smart homes are automated to the point where you don’t need to talk to your room.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wouldn’t trust Alexa

      Trusting Alexa/Amazon is insane. It wasn’t insane X years ago (your value of X will vary), but it definitely is insane now

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        As someone with ASD, GAD, and MDD (all diagnosed if it matters), smart home devices are an essential service to me. I can quickly set redundant reminders to help me with personal routines, add stuff to my shopping and to-do lists, and quickly get my lights and music set to what I need them to be when I am experiencing an anxiety episode. I definitely understand that my data is good and harvested at this point, and I don’t trust them to have done anything good with it. But these dots have made my life work since I bought my first one, and they’ve significantly reduced the anxiety I used to be riddled with.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m glad these devices have proved useful for people like yourself, even at the expense of your data. you take the bad with the good, as they say.

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    With how garbage Alexa is now, there is no way in hell I’m paying them anything. I’d love a refund for the three useless dots I have now.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    How long till there’s a solid project to gut Alexa devices and run them from pis arduinos and pico’s?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been wondering this. I have multiple of the older (non-Dot, the tall, cylindrical ones) Echoes. I hate using them. But I do like the form factor and sound quality.

      It probably can’t be too hard to gut everything but the speakers, microphone and DC port, then wire in a Pi / Pi Zero, right…?

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I assume their motherboard is a write-off. The form factor in speaker are probably all we have to start with. For a few bucks you could turn it into a decent Bluetooth speaker. Want to get a little more intense if you want to do anything interesting like voice control.

        I’d really like to find a way to drive the display and touch screen on the shows

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah that’s kind of the direction I was thinking. I really want to have access to the screen and the touch controls on the shows though. It’ll all come in time.

            There’s another really wicked side project I saw running on pis. You put a Bluetooth enabled device in every room and it tracks where your items are. So you could ask where your keys aren’t to triangulate which room in your house they were in.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People don’t want that shit for free… Why would they pay for it.

    Just slap more ads on it, I don’t know haha

    • Cloudless ☼@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The New Siri seems to be quite useful, with “personal context” understanding my calendar, messages, mail etc.

      ChatGPT 4 voice mode is very impressive, with the conversation getting clarifications and finding exactly the information I want (when it is not hallucinating). ChatGPT-4o will be amazing if it is as good as what we saw from the demo.

      It is not for everyone, but I personally use AI chat every day and find it useful.

      • ShadowRam@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ll integrate ChatGPT into my household when I can run it locally on my own server computer.