• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hi, I know nothing about the drag scene, curious about the definition here.

    I thought drag was specifically men dressing up as women, is drag any gender putting on too much makeup and wearing gaudy outfits?

    It’s just the look?

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not just the look, it’s performative. It can be any sex assigned at birth and any gender - including nonbinary, as the subject of the article identifies.

      Depending on your viewpoint, there’s an argument to be made that KISS, Alice Cooper, and many hair metal bands were a form of drag.

    • dumples@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the definition is getting more loose in recent year with different types of drag queens.

      I like to think it’s gender clowns in the nicest way. The art is playing with gender and gender expectations in an aesthetic, comical or thought provoking way.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I still don’t even understand what gender is, in my language there is only a word for (typically biological) sex and nothing more.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sex isn’t gender, there are plenty of trans folks that never seek surgical conversion, body dysmorphia is a common condition among trans people but not inherent to being trans and, finally, fuck off.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think it’s a valid question, and I don’t think you should be downvoted actually. Now, I hope you do read my answer.

      The answer is that some components of gender are socially constructed — like what different genders wear, what roles they fill, and certain behaviors. However, there is also very likely a component of gender that is biological and doesn’t always manifest itself in your bodily form or sex organs, but in the brain.

      We know from genetics that it’s common for mutations to occur. We also know that certain chemicals and hormones impact brain chemistry, especially during gestation. So, why is it so far fetched that how one thinks of one’s self in their mind might not align with their bodily characteristics?

      Sure, on the whole, people who identify as masculine in their brains tend to have a penis and tend to be physically attracted to those who present outwardly as feminine and have vaginas. And those who identify as feminine tend have vaginas and tend to be physically attracted to those who present outwardly as masculine.

      But, nature, genetics, and hormones can result in those three components - gender, sex, and sexual preference - having different combinations. Trans folks might have a physical body that is different from the gender they feel they are in their mind. They might feel relieved to bring these two things into alignment, and even to adopt some of the socially constructed components of a gender that they identify as in their mind.

      We also know from the existence of gay and lesbian people that sexual preference does not always align with one’s sex or gender. It is possible to identify as a man, and to be attracted to men. It is possible to identify as a woman and be attracted to women. Why? Well, nature, genetics, and hormones can some times create people who have small differences from the average population.

      That’s all it is and the existence of these types of people poses no real threat to you. Nor are their differences from your own a valid reason to deny them equal treatment under the law, nor privacy in the medical decisions they make to feel more like themselves.

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I appreciate the point you’re making, but I’m not entirely sure that on average slight differences indicates much of a biological component. Ie. trans or gay people having slight biochemical differences on average says nothing about any individual trans or gay person. Furthermore, there is very miniscule average difference between cis-AFAB and cis-AMAB brains so much so that I bet it would be impossible to find a sex difference between them for many.

        There might be a biological component to sexuality or gender identity, there might not be- it doesn’t really matter. It should be enough to say, I don’t like how I look, I want surgery to correct that.

        • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I think you’re trying to make an argument from a perspective of free will and rights — like if I one day wake up and just choose to change my gender then I shouldn’t need any scientific nor other basis to explain that decision. I don’t oppose the idea, necessarily, but I’m not sure it captures the full picture.

          I have LGBTQ+ family and they describe it as something that is not a choice and that they knew from an early age that they identified this way. Even when I think of my own identity, it’s something I know about myself and not one I could choose to change on a whim.

          Within the scope of the law, things that are perceived to be choices within one’s control are more likely to be regulated. It’s harder to justify regulating those components of ourselves that we inherit.

          • aidan@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t feel I could change the foods I like on a whim, that doesn’t mean there’s a biological component(for some dislikes there is though) to it. My boyfriend is gay and he admits he has no clue if he was born with it or not.

            Within the scope of the law, things that are perceived to be choices within one’s control are more likely to be regulated. It’s harder to justify regulating those components of ourselves that we inherit.

            I know this isn’t what you’re doing, but I feel some people use this as a justification to push something they know is unproven.

      • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sex is immutable, you are aware that sex is more than the appearance of sex organs right?