The new matchup between Trump and Harris is helping Democrats close the enthusiasm gap, in part by capturing the attention and interest of young voters who historically vote at lower rates than older generations. But the historic nature of Harris’ candidacy as the party’s first Black woman and South Asian presidential nominee, coupled with the rapid shift in the campaign’s tone, has young voters of all political stripes taking a hard look — some for the first time — at the role they could play in November.

If motivated, Gen Z voters could have a major impact on elections. Texas’ population has the second youngest median age of any state, other than Utah. And in 2020, there were about 1.3 million Texans ages 18 to 24 who were registered to vote. Those voters have historically turned out to vote at rates lower than any other age range, with voter participation rates increasing steadily as age ranges increase.

About 43% of young Texans aged 18-29 voted in 2020 — an eleven point increase from 2016. 66% of all eligible voters and 76% of eligible voters age 64 and older voted that same year.

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      1 month ago

      If, and that is a huge if, Texas goes blue, Abbott and Paxton will 100% call it fraud and make Texas send Trump electors. There is 0 doubt in my mind on this. Things will get bad very quickly, because if Ttump loses Cruz lost in a blowout and a dem senator from Texas is paramount to heresy

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      IDK, every time I’ve thought the GOP was done, it clawed it’s way back out of the still open grave.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        You are right on one thing, it has been done. That is, it’s not the same party as before. If MAGA types had come up during Reagan, you better believe that the GOP would have denounced them. That party is dead, something new is here now. The question is really how long the party that uses the name GOP will survive.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a nice dream but sadly I don’t think one that will happen this election. Gerrymandering and vote suppression has already seen to that.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Gerrymandering

        Gerrymandering can be pretty brittle. It relies on accurate models of who will vote and for whom. If the underlying assumptions are either wrong or change, then it can backfire. Here’s an extreme napkin-math example to illustrate the point:

        You have 3 districts. Candidate A is extremely unpopular. You split the voters to get 2 out of 3 districts for candidate A.

        District 1:

        Candidate A: 5%

        Candidate B: 50%

        Not Voting: 45%


        District 2:

        Candidate A: 20%

        Candidate B: 15%

        Not Voting: 65%


        District 3:

        Candidate A: 25%

        Candidate B: 20%

        Not Voting: 55%

        As you can see, even though if you add up all the voters for candidate B they heavily outnumber candidate A’s voters, by siloing them into one district you can win. But look at the margins for the other 2 districts. It doesn’t take many new voters who you assumed wouldn’t vote to upset your scheme. Depending on exactly how unpopular your candidate is, the margins for this might be pretty tight. It only takes an extra 10% of the voters moving from not voting to candidate B to cause a landslide 3 district sweep in this example.

      • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        My friend’s neighbor rage moved to Texas because he was tired of Oregon politics.

        If Texas goes blue I am totally sending them a laughing emoji.