• Google is transitioning Chrome’s extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the V3.
  • This means users won’t be able to use uBlock Origin to block ads on Google Chrome.
  • However, there’s a new iteration of the app — uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.
  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    363
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d just like to reassure everybody that you can quit using Google Chrome. I switched to Firefox a year ago. You can switch to something else too. Give it a try.

    Wait, I don’t need to nudge anybody. After all the ads start invading their browsing experience I doubt anybody will need much prodding.

      • Maestro@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        179
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why wait? Migrate now. There’s even Firefox for mobile with ublock

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            On Android, Firefox for iOS doesn’t have addons because Apple.

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              For real the votes here have so much “well it works on my machine so you must be wrong”-energy

            • maccentric@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              The Orion browser has rudimentary support for Firefox extensions. UBlock origin seems to work for me. Best I’ve found for iOS

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 month ago

            Only on Firefox Android.

            As far as I know, Safari is the only browser with Adblock on iOS.

            • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 month ago

              Also third party browsers on iOS are forced to use a janky slow WebKit WebView instead of the accelerated WebKit on Safari.

              In the EU, things are different and third-party rendering engines have been forced upon Apple, so people there may have more options.

            • H4mi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              I use Firefox Focus on iOS. It blocks quite a bit without addons.

          • Maestro@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes. You can install extensions on firefox mobile just like you can on the desktop version. IIRC it’s the only mobile browser that does this.

          • Orbituary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Mull is a Firefox fork with even more privacy features. There are others that I’m sure people will chime in with.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I personally enjoy Ecosia. They’re the ones who plant trees whenever you use their search engine, and while not the best, at least their mobile app has a built in ad-blocker that imo seems pretty decent.

        • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I tried but for some reason certain websites can’t play any videos on Firefox without buffering every like 5 or 10 seconds for a few seconds. It happens on 100% of videos on YouTube and like 50% of videos on any other website. It’s super annoying, so back to chrome I went and I guess I’ll stay until ublock bites the dust and I have to move.

    • _bcron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Firefox with NoScript is better than any adblocker I used. It blocks the ‘disable adblocker’ popups alongside ads and most sketchy shit in general

        • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s definitely more of a hassle than most people will want to deal with. But I still prefer to have it and selectively enable things as needed, because quite frankly I’d rather deal with predictable hassles of my own making than be bombarded with new bullshit every day due to ever worsening trends in enshittification.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Tip: its not better if you know its to much hassle for most people. But dont let that stop you from posting your ideas. The more power to those that such is not a hassle.

      • icosahedron@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        iirc some hardened firefox configs, including arkenfox, recommend using ublock ONLY. other privacy extensions like noscript aren’t worth using because ublock replicates all of their features plus more

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Formerly made by the same dev. Not because somebody else took it over, but because he deprecated it entirely.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because it can ruin your browsing experience all together. It’d be like installing multiple anti-virus programs on your Windows PC

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Easy to understand. People don’t like change.

        Despite 25 years in IT, and knowing better, I only recently switched back to Firefox. I expected a fair bit of hassle, and I won’t say the transition was seamless, but I was astounded.

        Those of us in the know aren’t doing any good circle jerking ourselves over our superior browser. We need to get our friends, coworkers and relatives engaged. And that should be easy if we contrast our ad-free experience with theirs.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nobody that cares about seeing ads is still on chrome. I bet they don’t lose more than 8-10% market share in a year even that is probably super high

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve always used Firefox on every other device I own, but now I need to do something about my Chromebook.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I always wondered about this and how all the ad blocking apps have complete access to every webpage you visit.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Susceptible to intrusive ads and viruses.

    My Windows computer was infected more than once by virus spreading ads on legitimate websites. The site owners denied any responsibility for the viruses saying it was the fault and responsibility of the ad companies. Never again.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The site owners are correct. And if the ad companies can’t be bothered to vet their ads, I can’t be bothered to look at them.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    KilledByGoogle up next: Chrome. You mean they pulled the plug on Chrome.

    A lot of momentum to dissipate but the ad blocker defines a bearable web experience.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you want to avoid ads it might be a good idea to not use products from a company which primary goal is to make money on ads…

    But hey, what do I know…

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used Firefox when it first came out. Google and Mozzila got into a hot race to make the best browser and they both did well. Somehow I ended up using Chrome a lot more even though I thought that by the time the race ended they were pretty even. Both were very fast and had great plugin libraries. Chrome looked nicer out of the box, but Firefox is highly customizable. Since the end of that race, Chrome has gotten worse and Firefox is about the same. I’ve switched back fully to Firefox, and the only thing I miss is the “Piss off publisher frames” plugin, that I haven’t found a replacement for. It’s a nice browser.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I switched to chrome for several years. Back then I was using Gmail and google docs et cetera. I naively thought Google were the good guys.

      At that time the chrome ui was better. As an example, Firefox still had a separate search bar and address bar, although you could search in the address bar if you wished.

      More recently I think the “nice ui” thing has tipped back towards Firefox. Chrome seems to have evolved some extra buttons.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        As an example, Firefox still had a separate search bar and address bar, although you could search in the address bar if you wished.

        The advantages of that was you could set the URL bar and search bar to different search engines. I would do a Google search with the URL bar while keeping the search bar set to Wikipedia. Eventually this feature was removed, and then the search bar itself (since there was no reason to search from the URL bar and a dedicated search bar.) It’s a feature I missed for a while, but I got over it.

        • feannag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You know you can set up custom strings to use different searches, right? E.g. typing w: and then your search string to search Wikipedia.

      • zueski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have never understood the desire to combine the search and the address fields. I occasional search a url when I forget the rules for what it thinks is keyword. It just seems like a scheme to collect more data by bouncing your intended site to google and increase your reliance on them rather than being a real UI feature.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, it’s ironic that one of Google’s selling points was that Chrome didn’t have a lot of clutter. It’s even where the name comes from. Now it looks messy. It’s no Microsoft product yet, but it’s definitely one of the ways it used to be better.

    • jay@mbin.zerojay.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would be on Firefox myself except that I need Webassembly that functions at a decent speed and It’s about 30-100 times slower on Firefox than it is on Chrome and hasn’t changed in yeeeeears.

  • echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.

    Then what is the purpose/value of it?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its able to block some ads. However, from a security perspective this basically means google chrome is no longer a web browser that should be used in a professional setting, let alone for your private and personal work

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          100% don’t use it at home. I’m saying if you wouldn’t even use it at work (and you seriously shouldn’t anymore, its a total liability) you for sure shouldn’t use it at home

  • ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not trying to troll or anything, but what can Chrome do that Firefox cannot?

    I’ve always felt like Firefox has more useful features like screenshotting, etc.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even if it didn’t have superior functionality, I’d still support & use firefox over chrome just because I don’t care how fast the sports car is: if it’s not going where I tell it to, I ain’t gettin’ in.

    • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I only break out Chrome(or Edge) for two reasons:

      One is access to serial ports to flash ESP devices, or update the firmware on my XR glasses. Firefox can’t do that.

      The other is to automate Twitch drop collection. The addon I found to reload broken streams and collect drops while I’m at work only has a Chrome version.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The addon I found to reload broken streams and collect drops while I’m at work only has a Chrome version.

        The question is, is it gonna have a Manifest V3 version?

        • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Looking at it, seems not. Google store page says it doesn’t follow best practices and may soon no longer be supported. AFAIK it’s a single dev hobby project so this might be the end of it. Ah well. I’ll just no longer have as many free skins for games.

    • bokherif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some websites intentionally break Firefox for some reason. I’ve had numerous issues on Firefox which were resolved by switching to Chrome. These could potentially be fixed by a User-Agent string change, but instead of dealing with it I switched to a Chromium based browser.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is as good a place as any to challenge firefox users: what are you doing to support the project?

    Using their software doesn’t support them, unless you search with Google and I doubt many users reading this do.

    Mozilla may be deserving of criticism, but criticism alone does not support them.

    I fear that one day we will lose firefox.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What’s even worse is every time someone mentions Firefox, some chucklefuck has to go hardcore negative on everything Mozilla does that is 1/10th as shitty as Google. Just shut your piehole if you don’t like the only somewhat private open source browser.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Let’s be honest, Mozilla is only 1/10 as shitty as Google because they’re 1/100 the size. If they had the resources, they’d be just as awful. They’ve already shown us how awful they can be at their current size, I can’t imagine how bad they’d be if they were at Google’s scale. Firing your employees and giving your execs bonuses is 100% a Google-like move, and the only reason they stopped at a few hundred employees was because they didn’t have more to give.

        Just because they make a good open source product doesn’t make them immune from criticism.

        • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You severely underestimate how shitty Google is. I highly doubt Mozilla would try to pull shit like Web Integrity or making their sites work worse on competitor browsers on purpose even if they were as large as Google. (Though, maybe to become as large as Google they would have to start doing this kind of shit so you might be right in some way.)

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Aw man. I really like Vivaldi for its productivity and customisation. Guess I’ll have to go back to FF and try trick it out some.