• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    232
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Flaws:

    • fails to address leap years
    • fails to address 365th day
    • moon cycle will still slowly deviate
    • retains clunky 7-day week that doesn’t interact will with decimal counting system

    I like it, but I got an even better proposal. Weeks should have ten day weeks, and each month should have 3 weeks. summer/winter solstice and the spring/autumn equinox as well as new years day are special holidays that fall between months and interrupt the week cycle. In leap years, new years is two days.

    The 1st, 11th and 21st of each month are now Mondays, so you can tell the weekday of any date. Months are the same length just like in Jesse’s proposal, but an even 30 instead of a clunky 28.

    I’ve thought about this a lot

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Congratulations, you’ve successfully reinvented the Egyptian civil calendar, complete with the intercalary holidays and all. Literally the only change is to add weeks. And yes, it did work really well, especially since the feast could add or lose a day to adjust to a known reference (the rise and fall of the Nile in their case). I second this proposal to go back.

        • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No dammit, we want 3 days off in the current 7 day week cycle. 5 days off a 10 day week works for me. We ask for that, get negotiated down to 4 day weekends and it works.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno man, if hump day meant I still had the rest of the day plus 3 more days until the weekend, I think I’d snap.

          • realitista@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah you’d definitely need one day in the middle. Or Id say even better, a 3 day and 2x2 day work weeks with days off in between.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope that one of the new days is named after you and we all curse you every Potatuesday for creating more workdays.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the 10 days week, but people, please rush to create a new religion to cover multiple free days or im out

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weeks should have ten day weeks

      And instead of calling them “weeks”, we could call them by the much more self-explanatory term “tendays”.

      summer/winter solstice and the spring/autumn equinox as well as new years day are special holidays that fall between months and interrupt the week cycle

      You can simplify it a little bit by putting the intercalary days between months, rather than using them for the solstices. We can put Midwinter between January 30 and February 1 and Midsummer between July 30 and August 1, in the northern hemisphere.

      For the sake of putting it in a more user-friendly location, our leap day should be in the summer for the northern hemisphere (where most of the population is). So put it the day after Midsummer.

      The only thing I would do differently from the Calendar of Harptos is that, like you, I would use New Year’s Day as the 5th annual intercalary day.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, I’ve never heard of that site before, but I am definitely in its target market. Thanks for sharing!

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        the equinoxes and solstices are roughly 90 days apart anyway so we can do both :)

        Calendar of Harptos actually influenced my post hehe

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          the equinoxes and solstices are roughly 90 days apart anyway so we can do both

          Right, but my point was that we shouldn’t use either equinoxes or solstices, because they occur around the 21st of their month at present. It’s better to put the intercalary days in between months so that a single month doesn’t get awkwardly split up.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weeks should have ten day weeks, and each month should have 3 weeks.

      Here’s why I’m going to say no. It’s because businesses would just rip us off by turning the working week into 8 days and just retaining the 2 day weekend.

      No, and double no.

      • enki@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Businesses don’t have the power to do that if we collectively tell them no. But that being said, how DO you split up a 10-day week keeping the same basic ratio of “weekend” days?

        Three weekdays, followed by a single “weekend” day or mid-week break, then four weekdays followed by a two-day weekend?

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        3-1-4-2 would work and give 70% work to 30% off - currently we have 71.4% work in a 7 day week so it’s pretty similar with less friday burnout

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Should be from workers’ perspective, but 3-1-4-2 is still a win for pretty much everyone as it would most likely improve productivity potentially more than 4-3 while also giving “more” (marginally, but still about 4 days per year) time off than 5-2

    • xeekei@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What names shall we give the new weekdays? Because I was thinking maybe we should rename a few existing ones, so no weekdays start with the same letters. Then they can be abbreviated to their respective first letters.

    • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Current workforce is schedule around a 7day centric week. It’s far easier to reorganize where the weeks fall in the year than changing the structure of a week. Suddenly the workforce would have segment of work overlapping between weeks, it’s an organizational nightmare.

      The international fixed calendar did propose a solution for the 365 days and leap year but it’s basically out-of-the-week holidays.

    • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see why 7 day weeks are bad in regard to the number system. We rarely need to divide the days of the week into equal portions. Remembering 1, 8, 15 and 22 as mondays would be trivial after a while.

      You also claim that failure to address the 365th day and leap years is an issue, but your proposal also includes several cycle-breaking days. So the same issue would persist.

      Moon deviation isn’t something I really worry about, but having a period which almost align with the cycle seems useful. It would be easy to just examine the initial phase within the month to chart out the rest of the month.

      However, I think the biggest flaw is that the calendar would be divided into 13 equal parts, which sucks to divide into typical use cases, i.e. into 2 parts. You could split the 7th month, but it’s not really elegant. Dividing the year into 3 or 4 parts would be a mess.

    • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do five day holiday for end of the year to account for the extra days like the Mayans did but I really like your idea of spreading four of them out to the solstices and equinoxes!

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dec can be the month with 29 days and a 4 year leap day. That way all the nonsense is in one place.

      Moon cycle doesn’t matter.

      7 day system is not clunky it is human.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any solution that has some form of “oh those days? Nah, we don’t count those” is disqualified immediately in my book.

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a software developer, I would rather give up the 1.25 days off a year just to not have to work around some weird monthless and weekless date every year.

        • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm fair enough. Let’s make the intercalary days part of the last week of the last month before they happen for programming/numbering purposes. So Midsummer is just June 31st, or the 11th day of the 18th week.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        laughs in Egyptian…

        They had 5 or 6 intercalary holidays to celebrate the new year and adjust to the rise of the Nile (and we’d adjust it to astronomical time with leap years). It actually worked really well, and kept the people happy with a 5-day rest and celebration each year (something this world could definitely use).

        • Norgur@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t have software though and you don’t know if it either worked well (since the ppl who kept this system going were the same people who wrote about it) nor of it kept ppl happy. Besides: you can do that without the “not counting those” part, couldn’t you?

          • Godnroc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think of it like the appendices of a book. The main story is counted with numbers, page 10, but the appendix is counted with Roman numerals, page X. While adding to the appendix increases the number of pages in the book, it does not change the length of the story.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you typically get paid an amount per year, divided between pay periods. You work the same amount, get paid the same amount overall, and get more pay periods at the expense of less pay per period

      • Pogbom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s the same amount of weeks though. It’s just spread over 13 months instead of 12 so it would be the same total bi-weekly pay periods.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not necessarily, some companies do half way and end of the month instead of strict every two weeks so they can claim a consistent monthly wage

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would like to believe in calendar reform as a goal. At the same time, I think calendars are one of the only pretty decent somewhat universal standards we have going for us, and if we changed it at all, you KNOW we would just be using two competing standards, not everyone would want to switch because people are stupid, so unless you forced it from the top down through technology, like a really advanced, shitty version of y2k, which would make people super pissed, I dunno if any of it would work.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the reason. Small changes like un-doing Daylight Savings is doable. But moving every holiday, birthday, and anniversary to another month+day combo would make this move daunting. The inertia of this kind of data would just make any transition period super long. So while you could implement the new calendar as a locale for phones and computer operating systems, but you’d probably be using two calendars for the rest of your life.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Counterpoint: 1st shift, 2nd shift and 3rd shift work. Some people are better off using different systems that exist alongside but separate from the norm.

      … And vice versa, workplaces and life offer us systems that dont work well for us but we need to use them because we need money to live. So not only would 3rd shift be a bad fit for most people, I’d argue most people do worse with the current calendar than they could with a new one.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair point actually, I suppose, then, that my point, retrospectively, is that nobody should ever expect that, were we to adopt any new calendar or time measurement system, we’d somehow do less math. We will only ever do more math.

        There is only math.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It really annoys the hell out of me that we don’t use a better calendar. I think about this once a week at least. I feel like being stuck with the Gregorian calendar is a good example of why so many inefficient structures exist in society - some assholes centuries ago decided on a thing, and out of habit and laziness we’ve stuck with it since.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I came up with this independently years ago. It’ll never catch on for the idiotic reason that you can’t subdivide 13 like you can 12. 13 is a prime number, while 12 can be divided easily by 2, 3, 4, and 6. 12 is like the whore of simple math.

    • BigT54@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but that only matters for months. We could instead just use weeks since there are 52 weeks per year, so a quarter would be 13 weeks instead of 3 months. It would be easier to determine how many weeks there are in a span of a couple months because it’s not variable, or any number of months because they’re just multiples of 4. I know a lot of people would be turned off by the system because the number 13 comes up so often and people are superstitious but it really would make things easier imo.

    • Flambo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      can we put the extra 30 hours on the end of each year as a formless blob of ‘time off’?

      • MightyGalhupo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about syncing with the sun? I feel like doing that for a day every year and every 4 years an extra day after would be better.

    • tweeks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only let the new “last month” have one extra day would fix this. That would break the Weekdays, but perhaps that’s not so bad as recurring events like birthdays and holidays are then not always destined per se to be on the same weekday.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      At a certain point in each year, probably at the end, we get one extra monthless day, a holiday.

      Every 4 years we do two monthless days.

      Also, what the fuck is wrong with Jesse? We start each month on Sunday, so that the month is divided into 4 weeks. Not one almost-week, three full weeks, and a spare hanging chad of a Sunday.

    • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The day doesn’t have to exist in a month. It can be its own day at the end/beginning of the year.

  • Matcraftou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this true??? If so WHY THE F… ARE WR STILL USING THE CURRENT CALENDAR.

    Honestly I would be all for a new calendar if this is true

    • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The main hiccup is the system is off by a day. Some people “fix” this by saying the extra day should be “new years day” or something similar that exists outside the main calendar and doesn’t have an actual date or day assigned to it. Personally I think that’s kind of silly but it does work.

      The second problem which to me is a much bigger problem, is he argues every month starting on Monday is a feature, I think it’s a bug. The result of this is every date is the same day, every year. If you are born on a Wednesday, your birthday will always be on a Wednesday. I like it mixing up and getting to have your birthday on different days.

      Also almost everyone will have a new birthday they have to learn and too many people would simply be unwilling to go along with that.

      And all that is ignoring the monumental task of changing every computer system in the world.

      Edit: also 13 is just kind of a rubbish number to work with and doesn’t divide into anything nicely.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same day every year is definitely a feature. Make holidays on Fridays or Mondays. Celebrate your birthday on Saturday if you want.

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will concede that it would make some things easier, like if someone says are you busy on the 5th, you can instantly know the 5th is a Friday or whatever. But I still don’t like it. And without researching in detail, I’m betting there are holidays, particularly religious ones, that wouldn’t be okay with moving the date to match the weekend closest to it for reasons.

          • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most religious holidays have already been moved people in three generations won’t care. Most will appreciate the weekend adjacent scheduling. Things like the Fourth of July can just be Independence Day like it already is.

      • Sea_pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I am that guy but the word is ‘hiccup’, not hickup. Although, coming from a family of rednecks, this fits as we do tend to mess stuff up quite often.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All indigenous people around the world knew the wisdom of the turtle … It’s almost as it white man severed the connection between the people and the sun …

        Wtf is this woo woo garbage lmao

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        how did the cherokee account for the fact that this is mathematically incorrect and would cause dates to drift across the actual solar year?

        • Ĺįĺįţĥ ţĥę §ęŕpęŋţ🍏🐍@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, it’s incorrect when it comes to the solar year but is correct when it comes to the lunar cycles. So I guess they didn’t track time by the solar year then. It’s just a matter of cultural perspective. Tracking the seasons and the lunar cycles were probably more important to Indigenous Americans because of needing to know when to seed, harvest, and hunt as opposed to knowing the exact time it takes for the earth to loop around the sun.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            the seasons are a function of the earth’s position in its orbit around the sun, not the number of moon cycles that have taken place

              • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                you’re the one badly misunderstanding the how the solar cycle works, how the lunar cycle works (it’s not exactly 28 days, the turtle shell method wouldn’t work here either), how seasons work, mythologizing “Indigenous Americans” as though they’re a monolith and pretending they’re too stupid to realize that the flower moon of this year is a lot warmer than the flower moon of the year they were born. you’ve substituted pop mythology for actually thinking about a problem, then got defensive, insulting and shitty when someone pointed out that your basic assumptions are deeply, provably flawed. if you’re gonna be a dick, at least be smart.

                • What’s your problem? Why am I your target? Please explain. All I did was point out that the concept of the 13 month calendar is really old. Then I said it’s accurate if you aren’t worried about a full sun cycle. Of course it’s not as accurate as the gregorian calendar. Why are you fucking blaming that all on me? What the fuck did I do to you to deserve this shit? And yeah, I know you’re a redditor because all you redditors tend to like to start arguments where there are none, just to make yourself feel important. Please take your calendar arguments to the Indigenous Americans who created it and explain to them why their “basic assumptions are probably flawed.”

                • How bouts you shut the fuck up and quit your childish fucking arguing. I’m sooo sorry that I ruined your fucking day so bad for mentioning a method of keeping track of time that differs from your understanding of the world. You do realize I didn’t create the concept, right? Just keep focusing your anger on me since it’s obviously my fault. Fucking drama queen Redditor piece of shit.

                  Have a nice day. 🖕

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the calendar business use to divide up quarters/periods for the year. Except one quarter has an extra month.

      • mulcahey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do other businesses besides Kodak use this calendar? Kodak is the only one named in that linked Wikipedia article

          • mulcahey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are there any examples? I’m really interested in what other companies use the 13 month calendar.

            I understand that businesses sometimes use a different calendar from the normal, but I think you’re describing the fiscal year, which is still a 12-month calendar. I don’t think there are any other companies that use a 13 month calendar.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just thought of something that could be better,

    Scrap months altogether, just divide the year into quarters of 13 weeks each, name them for the seasons, Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall, there isn’t really a reason why we need months specifically, if it’s to shorten date numbers then count by week number and day number

    Day/Week/Quarter/Year

    Today’s 7/8/4/23

  • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like 10 months each with 6 weeks of 6 days each for a total of 360 days and a 5 day holiday at the end of every year (6 days during a leap year)

    But Jesse really has opened my eyes to the possibility of a lunisolar calendar.

    • FardyCakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      10 months used to be the standard, until some Caesers ended up getting a couple of months named after them.

      September (7th month) October (8th month) November (9th month) December (10th month)

      Those months would also be named appropriately again if we dropped July and August…. But then I’d lose my birthday.

    • RandomStickman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Chinese clanander is lunisolar. It has alternating 29 and 30 day months and a leap month once in a while to catch up with the seasons and such.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The only authority I’ve seen that pushes 13 months is WMATA in DC, so they can charge you 13 times per year for a metro pass instead of 12. I always felt like that was some BS.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an incomplete explanation. You have New Year’s Day as an intercalary day, essentially January 0th creating a 3 day weekend. It’s either considered a Saturday or not assigned a day of the week at all. Leap days are either immediately after or inserted as June 0th the same way.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        so it’s still full of arbitrary bullshit? “we’ll just have a day that doesn’t count every year and another day that doesn’t count every 4 years except when the year is divisible by 100”.

        the idea here is that this system is more intuitive than our own, but it’s not.

        • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          No system can avoid arbitrary bullshit because the earth doesn’t go around the sun in an amount of time that’s an exact multiple of the time it takes to rotate.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds like why fuck with it then. There’s a cost to converting that will be paid only to replace one set of arbitrary bullshit with another set of arbitrary bullshit. You can say you prefer one bullshit to another and no one can dispute you on that, but in the end it’s just one set of bullshit vs another and I’m already committed to the current one.

              • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What is actually better about it? It’s a bit more intuitive except for where it isn’t, and it forces people to develop an entirely new concept of the 0th of January (and occasionally 0th of June). What do we do on the 0th? How does that fit into things that cycle with a period of 1 month? It breaks the idea that a 1 month period is equivalent to a 4 week period, which is supposed to be the entirety of why we’re doing this in the first place.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem is that the earth doesn’t orbit around the sun in a whole # of days. A sidereal year is 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes and 10 seconds, or 365.256 days.

          Likewise, the moon doesn’t orbit the earth in a perfect whole # of days either. The moon takes 27.3 days.

          Since we cannot change the orbital period or rotation of the earth, we are kind of stuck with accommodating the “arbitrary bullshit” of astrophysical bodies.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            then, as I said to the last person who pointed this out even though my math implies that I already know it, why this new bullshit instead of the bullshit we’ve already implemented?