• nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      I dunno, I feel like McDonald’s fries being fried in beef fat made them the big hit back in the day.

    • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, the food really did taste better, due to the cooking process and the different ingredients that were involved.

      For example, the fries were cooked in beef tallow; the meat they used was of better quality, and more nutritious. The bread was different as well—McDonald’s changed it again only a few years ago.

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ingredient quality does. The employee gives no fucks but if better beef is getting slapped on the grill the food will be better.

      • CubbyTustard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        mcdonald’s has always used 100% pure beef in their burgers, it’s a marketing point. How is the beef less nutritious than it used to be!?

          • Ooops@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or from which animal… More naturally grown meat has a completely different composition (also a much more elaborate texture) than the same meat from an animal quickly grown with a lot of growth hormones. But both are 100% beef.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              What grade of beef trimming? What part of the trimmings exactly? What ratio of what trimmings, and how much fat is used comapred to the rest?

              Lipton is 100% “tea,” but its also the sweepings left after all the good parts of the tea leaves have been filtered out and sold as different brands.

              Thats what McDonald’s is doing.

              • CubbyTustard@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                i don’t see how that affects the nutrition of the beef. You can only mix so much fat in because it melts away when you fry the burger up. They aren’t using lymph nodes and such the FDA requires them to call out non meat ingredients. The beef doesn’t lose nutrients as the pieces get smaller. They weren’t using prime cuts in the 80’s, either.

                • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Im not a dietician or a rancher, but not all beef is created equal. Being “beef” doesnt mean every cow is the same nutritionally. Its not just a ratio of muscle to fat that affects that. What cattle are fed, how they are treated/slaughtered, how much time they roam all effects the nutrients in the meat. I guarantee all of the above are worse in the cattle McDonald’s uses, even compared to the 80’s.

                  • CubbyTustard@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    what’s available on google is not really agreeing with your proposition here outside of grain fed/grass fed, and even there the difference is slight and mcdonald’s was definitely never serving grass finished beef. Your guarantee is worthless, you’re just spreading baseless FUD. There’s plenty of real reasons Mcdonald’s sucks you don’t have to invent spurious claims about the meat.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, I know for a fact that the Whopper has been enshittified since at least the 90s. It used to be one of my favorites but now tastes like shit and costs 3x the price.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No, McD’s has publicly changed various formulations over the years. Never for the better. Even just a couple years ago when they went to “never frozen” beef for some of their sandwiches - they tasted worse IMO, but I’m sure somehow it saved McD’s money.

      We’ve got a pub near us that costs about only 10 bucks more in total to carryout from there and feed my family on burgers and fries than if we go to McDs. But we get a large hand shaped patty cooked to our individual preferences, on a bun from a local bakery, generous portion of thick cut fries, and a better experience all around.

      It’s insane that McD’s prices are within spitting distance of the place. The drive-thru (and its related convenience) is the one and only benefit to McDs. I have reluctantly loved McD’s for most of my life, but there’s no doubt it’s gone downhill a few times, and for sure in the past few years. If they hadn’t also jacked up their prices it wouldn’t be so bad, but it’s really hard to justify eating there now.

      They’ve become as infested with corporate greed as every other company of any significant size.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a McDonald’s in downtown Seattle that doesn’t even have a drive-thru. What even is the point?