• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Newton’s third law. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

      Basically what that means is if the magnet is exerting some amount of force on the truck to pull it towards it, the truck is exerting the exact same amount of force on the magnet in the opposite direction to pull the magnet closer to the truck. This is why when you let go of two magnets they fly towards each other instead of one staying still (unless you hold it still) and the other flying towards it.

      If the arm in the picture could bend, the magnet would just stick to the front bumper. If it couldn’t move, the magnet would pull on the plate, but that would be cancelled out by the plate pulling on the magnet. They’re trying to attract each other, but neither of them can move, so it just stays still.

      Now, if the magnet was attached to a different truck, and that started moving, it would pull the truck along just fine. If the second truck was in neutral, it’d roll backwards and the two trucks would meet in the middle. But if you wanted them both to go, you’d have to turn on the engine in the second truck, and you’ve effectively just invented the world’s least reliable tow hook. You can’t cause a car to accelerate without some outside force (the second truck’s engine) pulling it along.

      Newton’s third law also applies to gravity. When the Earth’s gravitational pull makes something fall to the ground, that something actually exerts the same amount of force pulling the Earth towards it. The earth is several orders of magnitude heavier, though, so it doesn’t move very much. Gravity from the moon pulling on water in the ocean does create the tides, though.

    • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      The magnet pulls the truck to the right. The truck pulls the magnet to the left. They both have the same amount of pull. No one wins this tug-o-war.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        The best you can hope for is for the truck to move slightly to the right and the magnet to move far to the left until they meet

    • Kolgeirr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the magnet is attached to the truck bed, so the bumper is being pulled forward and the bed pushed back, and the forces cancel out to 0.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Dumb follow up question. If there’s a way to reverse the direction the bed is being pushed, with gears or something, will that work? lol

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 months ago

          You need a catapult in the back to fling the magnet ahead of you, you get pulled forward, pick up the magnet and fling it again. This technology has existed since the '20s but Big Internal Combustion Engine is repressing the tech.

        • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, because in the end, something needs to keep moving the magnet forward to keep the truck moving forward.

          This thought processes is exactly how scammers on YouTube make perpetual motion seem possible, but by definition, the forces always have to cancel out.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, but you’ll need something to turn the gears.

          Typically, we use a crank that converts a reciprocating motion into a rotation. Then we move a piston up and down by putting a little explosion at one end. Connect it to a tank of explosive fuel and badaboom, perpetual motion, as long as you have explosive fuel in the tank of course.

    • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Newtons laws of motion, most clearly the third.

      “If two bodies exert forces on each other, these forces have the same magnitude but opposite directions.”

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In simple terms: metal is just as much attracted to magnet as magnet is to metal, this is fundamental and doesn’t change under any circumstances.

      So the force driving the car forward is exactly equal to the force driving the car backward, and you can’t have one without the other.

    • baby_dwoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The truck will be attracted forward towards the magnet, but the magnet will also be attracted backward towards the truck with equal force. The backward force will be transfered through the arm holding the magnet and the net force on the whole system will be 0. If there was no arm holding the truck and the magnet apart, the truck could move forward slightly and the magnet could move backward to meet it. (The magnet would move much more than the truck since they would still have equal force applying to them, and the truck’s mass is much higher than the magnet’s.)

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And then to continue moving this way you’d have to unstick and move away the magnet, which would require just the same energy it takes to move the truck this far away

    • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Imagine that instead of a magnet there’s a spring there. Why is it more obvious now that it doesn’t work? How is a magnet different than a spring?

    • sour@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      is like blowing sailboat with fan

      will only work if fan isn’t part of sailboat setup

      • CaptainMcMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Funny thing is that this isn’t technically true. If the fan is strong enough, the current will hit the sail and reflect backward and to the side, creating some very inefficient thrust. Any fan strong enough to achieve this would do better to remove the sail entirely and just point the fan backwards, but it would technically work.

      • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If the fan blew across an airfoil aligned perpendicular to the axis of the boat, it can definitely generate thrust. The top of the airfoil will develop a lower pressure than the bottom, and the difference in pressure causes force that moves the boat. It’s just way more efficient to use a fan to push the boat.