• tegs_terry@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, it was started by rich people looking to increase their wealth and influence and has remained under their control ever since.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The American Dream has morphed into this “anyone can be rich” idea.

        When I was a kid, it was a house and two cars.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Which is basically a multimillionaire in today’s standards. Unless you mean two junkers and a house in the hood. I’m not opposed to the latter but it’s hardly anyone’s first choice.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You’re being very hyperbolic. We have a house and two cars. I have around $200 in my bank account. Admittedly, it helps that we do not live in the most desirable part of the country, but we also live paycheck-to-paycheck and have not even ever been hundred thousandaires.

            You can’t be poor and achieve it, but you don’t have to be rich either.

            • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I feel you. I have my house in the hood with my two Hondas.

              Shit should not be this difficult.

              A $200,000 home isn’t luxury but it also isn’t the American dream.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I didn’t mean to suggest that. Housing prices and car prices are ridiculously and unnecessarily high. I’m just saying that the American dream has morphed into something that at least a large proportion of the population can even now achieve into something that almost no one can achieve.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s only going to get worse. Money buys elections and Putin, along with American oligarchs have a lot to spend on getting their desired results.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yet it remains one of the happiest countries in the world. I’m not saying we don’t have our problems, because we clearly do, but the idea that the country is a “shit hole” is just baseless nonsense.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    More needs to be said about taxing the wealthy. 70% for every dollar over 10 million. Wealth tax for those hoarding wealth in stocks.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You are way too generous.

      Some own islands, land, mansions, art, bonds, cars, boats.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I read somewhere that that was literally only for a single person. But the fact that taxes were used to aggressively trying to curb wealth hoarding is something we need to look at today

  • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    Till we close the loop holes for these billionaire foundations buying elections (i.e. the Koch network) - billionaires will continue to tip the scales their way. Courts also need to be 10 year appointments, not life time.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s not just billionaires. If you put any amount of money into the S&P500 in Jan 1 2017, it would be worth more than twice as much today.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      But is it really fair that a person with 50 million can turn that into 100 million, whereas most people can turn at most $5,000 into $10,000?

      Earning $5,000 over 7 years is basically worthless.

        • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Using median makes it a loaded statistic skewed in favor of the minority (in this case, the wealthy).

          Over half the country is living paycheck-to-paycheck, so that median number is already in the ‘well-off’ category by default, making them irrelevant to the main point of discussion.

          • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Is that true? Median is literally taking the value in the middle. So if there are 30 million 70 year olds then it would be picking the 15th millionth person and using their savings.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You have it backwards. The mean, not the median, is skewed by outliers.

            If there are ten people in a room with $100 and one with $1000, the median is $100 whereas the mean is $200.

          • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Got to eat. Retirement is gone, and your 401k is nothing more than a subsidy so you can work part time as a greeter until death.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        But is it really fair that a person with 50 million can turn that into 100 million

        Yes.

        And since that can only happen by investing that amount into the economy, it’s wisely encouraged by the system, versus putting the 50 million in a vault somewhere.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The fact that you can’t see how this is a huge flaw in, at the very least, the American form of capitalism is sad.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You think it’s sad because you’re deeply ignorant. Do you also think that if the $5 baseball card you bought becomes worth $100, that that means you’ve stolen $95? lol

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They are not investing it into the great magical economy. It’s in hedge funds that actively destroy the economy.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Liquid assets are a type of wealth. For many people, liquid assets make up the biggest part of their wealth.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, they don’t. Liquid assets don’t increase in value. If they had $1 in cash seven years ago, it would be worth less than that today due to inflation.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Stocks are liquid assets. They can increase in value.

            T-bills are also liquid assets. They can also increase in value.

            Savings accounts and money market accounts are also liquid assets. They can also increase in value.

            • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m pretty sure that liquid assets are things that you can spend, so cash and bank accounts. Anything that you have to sell to buy things is not a liquid asset. (Note that we are not talking about barter. I had a friend at college who traded a snake for a VW camper, neither of which would be considered a liquid asset. Even though technically you could put the snake in a giant blender…)

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          When you’re a billionaire, most of your net worth comes from businesses you own, not liquid assets.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Billionaires are far more likely to own part of a business than 100% of a business. And if you own stocks, then you too own part of a business.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The New Bad Deal.

    Rich get richer and everyone gets fucked on their taxes while dealing with crazy high inflation.

    Thanks GOP! YOU GUYS REALLY KNOW HOW TO GOVERN

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    But what for? Even with the toys of millionaires (yachts, villas), over a few 100 millions it’s only a number.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They don’t just buy toys. They buy laws, politicians, service, deference, control, luxury, immunity…

      When you have that much money everything is for sale and people will kiss your ass to sell it to you.