Reddit says Microsoft’s Bing, Anthropic, and Perplexity have scraped its data without permission. “It has been a real pain in the ass to block these companies.”

Reddit says Microsoft’s Bing, Anthropic, and Perplexity have scraped its data without permission. “It has been a real pain in the ass to block these companies.”

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    4881·
    2 months ago

    "Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used,” Huffman said in an interview this week

    It’s not your data.

    Fuck off.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzEnglish
      68·
      2 months ago

      My only regret was not deleting all my comments before deleting my reddit account :P

      • elephantium@lemmy.worldEnglish
        571·
        2 months ago

        Don’t regret too much. I wouldn’t be surprised if reddit’s “delete” function was really just "move to the “suckers-wanted-to-delete-this” file.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.caEnglish
          20·
          2 months ago

          I “deleted” all my posts, then randomly had someone reply to a 3 year old post that wasn’t showing up in my profile but still showed on the page.

          Don’t delete your comments, edit them to be useless.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
            4·
            2 months ago

            And as a positive to editing rather than deleting, you may have your comment taken down by AutoMod anyway! I had AutoMod take down a ton of my comments because they were flagged a spam because I used a replacement text tool to mass fix a decade worth a comments on multiple accounts. So many messages from AutoMod…

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.websiteEnglish
          23·
          2 months ago

          Same, plus or minus a year.

          It took me a week, but I scrambled every comment and post with lorem ipsum and bee movie scripts, deleted the comments, then after verifying I could no longer find any of my original content on any search engine outside archive sites, I deleted the account.

          It took so long because r*ddit started limiting API access when they realized people were automating their profile scrubbing.

          As I’ve said before about certain countries, if you’re doing everything you can to prevent people from leaving [THING/PLACE] then you might just be shit.

          • FenrirIII@lemmy.worldEnglish
            43·
            2 months ago

            I was straight IP banned permanently for reporting the Israeli genocide fans and racists arguing for the eradication of Palestinians. I just deleted the account because I never imagined they would turn into such shitheels.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              4·
              2 months ago

              And here I got IP banned for saying we should murk the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. This was around the time the journalist got butchered in that Saudi Embassy. As an aside the Saudis have oil and are assholes how long till we start drone striking them?

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
                3·
                2 months ago

                As an aside the Saudis have oil and are assholes how long till we start drone striking them?

                They would either need to stop playing ball, or oil is no longer a staple for energy generation and transport needs.

                Until then, the 9/11 architects will be able to hang out and do whatever they want.

                Also, thanks for protecting your friends that day GW, here’s hoping you get “touched” by a friend from a long way away…

      • demizerone@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        2 months ago

        I deleted my top comments and left the trash, which was 15 years worth. AI can hallucinate off that trash all it wants.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish
      263·
      2 months ago

      Part of the ToS. Whatever you put on there is effectively theirs. Same with Facebook and your photos etc.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5189·
      2 months ago

      I mean it literally is. People post it there voluntarily knowing that. It’s what keeps the lights on.

      • cygnus@lemmy.caEnglish
        843·
        2 months ago

        Sort of, but not really. From the Reddit ToS (emphasis mine). Basically, you own your content but allow Reddit to use it however they want without crediting you. Only a corporate lawyer would call that arrangement “ownership”, but I digress…

        By submitting Your Content to the Services, you represent and warrant that you have all rights, power, and authority necessary to grant the rights to Your Content contained within these Terms. Because you alone are responsible for Your Content, you may expose yourself to liability if you post or share Content without all necessary rights.

        You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content:

        When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.caEnglish
          28·
          2 months ago

          Beyond that, if you are serving webpages with data on them, you don’t get to decide what people do with those pages. They can’t stop search engines from scraping

          • bassomitron@lemmy.worldEnglish
            17·
            2 months ago

            Just to nitpick, they can stop scraping, anyone can. However, doing so would require implementing barriers that tend to also negatively effect sites that are dependent on being discovered and browsed.

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
          142·
          2 months ago

          It’s actually a fascinating bind Steve/Reddit has put themselves in. Because it is a non-exclusive license, you can affirmatively declare your content is free for anyone to scrape or use.

          After that, if Reddit ever asserts rights over your content by, say, suing Microsoft for improperly using your content in training data, you now have a legal claim against Reddit for interference with either your ownership rights or with a contract via whatever license you have made your content available under.

          Now, maybe Reddit has a claim release in their TOS, but it wouldn’t prevent you from getting an injunction enjoining Reddit from restricting your data from being used by Microsoft.

          It’s kind of academic, because… it’s not really a victory that Microsoft is also training its AI on your data. But, hey, they’re probably doing it anyway and at least this way we get to screw over Huffman for being an ass.

          • Bookmeat@lemmy.worldEnglish
            3·
            2 months ago

            The only issue I see with this is that it can be argued that this license doesn’t grant third parties access to data on Reddit’s platform.

          • cygnus@lemmy.caEnglish
            21·
            2 months ago

            MS couldn’t access that content without scraping the page itself, though, which of course belongs to Reddit. From a legal standpoint, it’s like a paywall.

        • Bookmeat@lemmy.worldEnglish
          8·
          2 months ago

          It’s right there in the ToS: NON-EXCLUSIVE license. If they go to court, I would guess they lose.

        • chakan2@lemmy.worldEnglish
          318·
          2 months ago

          Lol…really? So the can reuse, modify, and remove all association with your content, but somehow you think you still own it?

          I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        31·
        2 months ago

        It literally isn’t. Even their shitty EULA only claims a license to use it, not that it’s their data.

        And approximately 100% of the data on their servers was created while it was accessible to literally anyone who wanted it without restriction through a free API. Virtually none of the content was ever intended to be kept from fucking search engines so it could be sold for AI.

      • Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        10·
        2 months ago

        Yup keeps the lights on and makes sure Spez gets his yearly 200 million bonus. It’s good that they are tightening the screw because 200 million is clearly not enough, he deserves double that at least.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.worldEnglish
        10·
        2 months ago

        They are not responsible for what people post, nor do they pay anyone to post, therefore I do not see how they can claim the data as “theirs”.

        They have their own self-regualted rules, but ultimately most anything is fair game for reddit to point at the user and say “we take no responsibility for what an individual may post on this public form”.

        The only thing they will have a problem with is CSAM, but even then as long the volunteer mods remain effective at removing it, reddit will not be responsible for anything users post.

    • snooggums@midwest.socialEnglish
      40·
      2 months ago

      When the internet was new I thought that the spread of knowleege would raise up people’s awareness of things they had not been exposed to under the false assumption that the vast majority of people where reasonable, but uninformed.

      Nope, I was wrong. At best a slight majority are reasonable with varying levels of ignorance and the rest are willfully ignorant.

      • Crismus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        2 months ago

        In the early years, I learned a lot of new things. The late 90’s had so much hope for the web and learning new things. I remember falling I to rabbit holes a lot more often back then because it wasn’t about video essays and persuasive videos.

        I miss all of those old text based chatting and the friends I made on Yahoo local chat rooms. Somedays I wish the social media sites run by algorithms didn’t surpass those old forums and chat rooms.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netEnglish
        43·
        2 months ago

        Internet is just a new form of mass media to control the minds of people who aren’t paying attention

        EDIT; Christ, I shouldn’t have had to say this, but obviously not the only thing. I just mean for mass media manipulation its no different than radio or movies. The usage of radio and the distribution of film is still a good thing when done positively. I shouldn’t have to spell shit all the way out like this

    • boonhet@lemm.eeEnglish
      9·
      2 months ago

      I don’t remember when it was starting out but I do remember the forums of the 00s as well as the overall online culture of the time. The fediverse is the closest I’ve gotten to feeling that again but obviously nothing will ever feel like that again because I’m an adult and all the sense of wonder is gone from the online world for me.

      At least here, we’re not on a platform owned by corporations.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 months ago

      Remember when you had RSS with HUNDREDS of different websites and had your own personal little newspaper every day 🥲

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      I just started hearing about some Facebook at some point, and then some (it’s Russia) Odnoklassniki and Vkontakte and a few other spaces.

      These seemed to be the sites which lamers use to feel themselves relevant with that Internet thing. Leprosoria of the Web. Places where I wouldn’t go, even if I would sometimes go to porn sites, especially when depressed.

      Normal people would use LiveJournal and move from ICQ to XMPP and Skype. Skype voice calls (back then they were better with countryside radio link than now with GPON) were a miracle, so me and everybody around me moved to Skype.

      Then there was a moment when the Web suddenly died and everyone was on those social networks.

      I actually blame LJ and Skype. Technically these worked fine, but they were a gateway drug.

      LJ made it easy to have something like a personal webpage, only it wasn’t personal, it was in LJ. ICQ lost popularity when it fought alternative clients, there were no alternative clients for Skype at all and everybody got used to service providers dictating how people should use their service, imposing their client software.

      It’s still terrifying how that ICQ run was the last such run in modern Internet’s history. A company fucked around and found out. Nothing like that has happened since. That’s my canary.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1081·
    2 months ago

    Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used

    It’s the users’ data, not yours, you rent seeking fuck

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    781·
    2 months ago

    “Let’s see … how do we get more people to visit our site? I know! We’ll prevent search engines from sending people to it!”

    …

    • Sordid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      25·
      2 months ago

      It’s phase three of the enshittification cycle. In phase one, you attract users by providing a good service. Once they’re locked in, you squeeze them for all they’re worth by switching focus to business customers. Once they’re locked in, you squeeze them by threatening to deny them access to the users on whom they now depend.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        14·
        2 months ago

        I had also described it elsewhere as the “suck all the value out before it’s dead” phase. They’re clearly no longer interested about growing the site; they’re just getting as much money as possible from their traffic and engagement history as possible now, because they know traffic and engagement is already declining.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.caEnglish
      20·
      2 months ago

      Big profit now is better than our long term image

      ~ Reddit shareholders

        • Sordid@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          It does make a certain amount of sense. Big profit now means you get a chunk of cash to invest in other quick profit schemes, and your wealth just keeps snowballing. It works as long as you don’t care that you never build anything that lasts.

  • Vipsu@lemmy.worldEnglish
    39·
    2 months ago

    Well Reddit should just sue these companies and see if these companies are actually breaking any laws. Holding sizeable chunk of the internet hostage also sounds like something the EU and US might want to look in to as it very much sounds like anti-competitive conduct or market manipulation.

    Also if these companies want to have greater ownership over the content generated by their users they should also be much more liable for the content posted to their sites. I mean when something like the Section 230 was written they probably did not take this in to account. If these companies want to start selling user generated content then they should simply lose the immunity from liability.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      2 months ago

      Reddit would lose badly that’s why they don’t sue. US’ 9th circuit ruled that scraping Linkedin is legal and Bing is not even scraping but indexing the data. Easiest case ever.

      It’s almost impossible to block web scraping especially someone with Microsoft or Perplexity resources.

      Its clearly an attempt to blackmail indexers into license deal as paying something to reddit could be actually cheaper than battling anti robots.

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 months ago

      While I don’t disagree with the general idea, Section 230 would introduce an uncontrollable risk into running any website with user-generated content and would essentially shut them down.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        If the site isn’t selling data, they wouldn’t lose 230 protection. So that would only be a risk for the companies selling their users’ data, not your regular forum or something.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      31·
      2 months ago

      they should also be much more liable for the content posted to their sites.

      why do people insist on making me defend reddit.

  • rhabarba@feddit.orgEnglish
    21·
    2 months ago

    Reddit says web clients have visited their public, free website without permission.

    Fixed.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 months ago

      Yeah this.

      Channeling Joe Pesci from “Casino”: “You only have that farking data because WE made that possible!”