US President Joe Biden has said he is not confident there will be a peaceful transition of power if Donald Trump loses the presidential election in November.

"[Trump] means what he says, we don’t take him seriously. He means it, all this stuff about ‘if we lose it will be a bloodbath’.”

Mr Trump’s comment that it would “be a bloodbath for the country” if he loses the election, made as he was talking about the auto industry in March, triggered a wave of criticism.

The Trump campaign, however, said the comment was specifically about the auto industry and had been deliberately taken out of context. It sent a fundraising email which said Trump’s political opponents and others had been “viciously” misquoting him.

  • P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 month ago

    But there’s been so many.

    “Dictator on day one”

    “You won’t have to vote anymore”

    Those are just the two off the top of my head as I’m heading back into work on my lunch break.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everything bad Trump ever says is either “a joke” or “out of context.”

      Weird how often he says things that everyone things he means and then he doesn’t mean them. I sure wouldn’t vote for a guy like that. He’s weird.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    lol classic biden

    come on joe, it’s been established that you can “say it like it is”:

    trump is going to incite riots and violent insurrection, he’s going to demand the military stage a coup, he’s going to call for civil war. trump is 100% going to attempt 1/6 ver 2.0 and there isn’t a human being over 5 on the planet who doesn’t know that to be the case

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      The one thing I am fairly certain about though is that, assuming riots like that are happening in D.C., Biden will not hesitate to send out forces to stop it. Trump could have but didn’t want to.

      There might be a few more Ashley Babbits this time.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        ah gotta love the old “just try breaking into my house and i’ll introduce you to my shotguns!!!” crowd lamenting over the cold blooded “murder” of someone breaking into not-her-property

        and yea. if these maga chucklefucks think DC is going to be the same soft cushy environment it was in 2021, then they’re even dumber than i thought. which is pretty fucking dumb. in addition to the dozens of snipers (that are visible), i’d be surprised if there’s a square inch of space in the whole motherfucker that isn’t covered by at least 4 cameras.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the entire quote:

    “No, we’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country, that’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars, they’re building massive factories.”

    The context is talking about Chinese cars, but the bit where he says “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country, that’ll be the least of it.” really looks to me like he’s saying there will be a bloodbath in general if he doesn’t get elected, the one in the car industry being small compared to it.

    I don’t know why I’m spending time and energy examining the idiotic ramblings of the orange gibbon.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I predict riots regardless of who wins.

    The only way to avoid it is if either side wins with a landslide, showing that the majority of the country is for the elected winner.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I doubt it. trump appears to have lost a lot of persuasive power.

      If Harris wins, I’m pretty sure all the conservatives are going to slink back under rocks for the next few years.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If Harris wins, a lot of places where Trump “should have” won are going to falsely claim fraud and refuse to certify their votes, leading to another Jan 6.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would respectfully disagree with that assessment.

        Even if 2024 is a huge enough electoral wipe out that Trump and his MAGA base are embarrassed to follow through on the violence they’ve been promising for years. Yes, Republicans might slink away and hide.

        But they will rebrand and be back within a few months. We’ve seen this before at the start of the Obama Presidency’, when the fall out from the G.W. Presidency showed that Republicans had shit the bed sooo hard, even hard core Republicans that I knew denied they ever supported W. (Even though a few had fucking pictures of the asshat on their office walls for years.)

        But the useful idiots that make up the core of the Republican base were back in a few months as “Tea Party” Republicans. Fully funded and promoted Koch and other billionaires. All those hard core W. supporters suddenly got angry and jumped on that band wagon.

        Make no mistake they will be back, even in the best case scenario. (Which I very much doubt will happen.)

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    It sent a fundraising email

    Trump’s response to everything, good, bad, indifferent, or wildly spun

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump said he doesn’t need the votes which is far scarier. They need to fear the consequences of trying to steal democracy from us.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Taken out of context” MFers when they actually read the primary sources of the Confederacy (⁠ノ⁠ಠ⁠益⁠ಠ⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, he’s got the most powerful “security” apparatus in the world under his command. The charge of the yokels on mobility scooters shouldn’t be a problem to deal with.

  • TwinkleToes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well - why would he be? Trump didn’t accept it last time, and this is well and truly the end of the road for him if he doesn’t win. He’s 77 as it is, but zero point zero zero zero zero percent chance he gets this close again.

    And the cost of not winning is monumental. It’s victory or destruction for the vulgar talking yam. If he’s no longer of any use to Russia, imagine what information might come out about him, especially if they themselves descend into instability.

    Trump never accepts any defeat, ever. It’s always a disgrace, the worst, most nasty this and that that’s so unfair to him. Of course he’s not going to accept a defeat. What the adults do about it is the important variable.

    Given his legal trouble, he very truly could either be president or imprisoned. he probably has less money than he wants us to believe, fleeing to Russia or Venezuela etc isn’t really an option. His money will just be seized by the state and he will be disposed of as an impotent, toothless old hippo, only capable of making noise, with no more use to offer anyone.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah it’s pretty obvious to everyone that it’s all or bust for trump. He’s desperate. Nothing to lose.

      They’re already strategising how to steal the election. They’re already on record saying they know exactly who to call when it’s time to validate the results from each state.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think Biden, being freed up and all, should spend some time fortifying the election results. I know the election is inherently flawed but there should be systems in place to stop another Jan 6th. Do some maintenance. Get commitments from the states themselves. Jus saying.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ditch the electoral college, certify the election with a popular vote, adopt ranked choice.

      But then the 1% would become the 10% and I’m sorry but that just won’t do, it’s a very nuanced system that boils down to Rich good Poor bad. /s

        • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s absolutely true. However with the SCOTUS rulings as of late regarding the Executive branch, it could be fun to try.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            If we ever get a trifecta again we need to kill the filibuster and then pass a law to expand Congress so the EC is effectively locked to the national result. As a bonus it seriously hurts lobbyists and gives us better representation.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. The danger here is GOP-controlled states refusing to certify a Trump loss, and the Federal government/Biden doesn’t have any power over that.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        refusing to certify is one thing, and isn’t necessarily violent.

        if the transition of power is not peaceful, that’s an entirely different manner, and yes Biden has the power to deal with that.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Corrupt election boards trying to throw the election to a corrupt House or corrupt SCOTUS is what causes violence.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, but there’s only so much he can do. Of course there are things he can do to prepare for violence, both directly and in coordination with state governors. That said, if people want to protest, they’re going to protest. The way things are, there’s a fine line between maintaining the peace and oppression. Republicans have, for years, been laying the groundwork for the oppression argument. It’s easy to say, “who cares” to that, but if enough people think they’re being oppressed by the government, things will get more violent.