• VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Really wish there was a way to block this kind of stuff from all my feeds. I already know this, and there is nothing I can do to stop it from happening, so I really don’t want to see it.

      • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And that still won’t do shit when a company like ExxonMobil produces more pollution in a single year than thousands of people will in an entire lifetime. Don’t sit here and act like anything I do will make a difference just because it makes you feel better.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It will cause at least one less gram to be emitted. You said nothing, but what you can do isn’t nothing. It’s just not much. But this is the survival of all life on earth we’re talking about.

          Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, it’s not going to get better. It’s not.

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            We have millions of people who care, and even if every single one of us produced a carbon neutral footprint(which isn’t possible for everyone) it still wouldn’t stop what’s coming at this point. It would slow it down but not stop it because 100 companies are responsible for 71% of all greenhouse gasses, and only 25 companies and state owned orgs are responsible for over 50% of the global industrial emissions. Without stopping them, you are throwing an icecube on a forest fire.

            Hell, the top 1% of co2 producers produce 1000 times more than the bottom 1% which is you and me.

            • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              So buy one more day for us to have a revolution and end the pollution. If you have 1/100000000000000 the power of an oil CEO, and you still use that power polluting the environment for your own convenience, then what makes you better than them? That you would theoretically have done less damage if only your actions mattered a little more?

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Accelerationists gotta accelerate, I guess. For the longest time it baffled me as to why anyone with intelligence would knowing act to destroy the planet and, with it, society. Then I learned about this shit called accelerationism and it all starts to make sense.

    We ARE in a hostage situation like someone commented, except we’re on a bus, speeding toward a cliff, and the rich elite refuse to take their foot off the pedal. They think they’re going to come out of societal collapse alive and poised to shape whatever comes next however they want. It’s literally the game of Monopoly with that fucking speed die version…

    • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      rich

      It’s not about the rich. No one cares, except for a small handful of people. The vast majority of people want to fly away on vacation, own a large home, have a crappy grass lawn, eat meat everyday. They see environmentalism as some sort of odd lifestyle. If you make a law that says they can’t use gas lawn mowers, they’ll scream and go bat shit insane, call you the devil. They are relentless in wanting to pave over anything living.

    • CyberDine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Jokes on them, the earth can stay a boiling lava pit for longer than they can stay in their bunkers.

      Also, good luck trying to have people service and maintain your bunker system as you dictate their lives without any of them just trying to kill you.

      It would be so much easier to just admit they have to work with the poors to keep the earth alive so everyone can live than just wipe out humanity and think they can outlast it

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well since there’s nothing I can do then I guess it’s time to kick back and wait for the end of humanity. We had a good run.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can and you should (and you probably already do).

      Kick back and know that you’re doing something, whatever it is.

      • umulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nicely said.

        And even if we could do a bit more, why should we make more sacrifices, when big corporations are accountable for much of the environment’s issues?

        • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Why would a couple of fossile destroyers change their very lucrative business-model if millions of first world citizens are just as cheap, greedy and irresponsible as well? I’m pretty sure a lot of us would act very much like them, if we were put in their places. It’s so easy to point fingers at the billionaires. As long as they don’t change, why should I?! To be a better person, that’s why! Fuck those psychopaths, stop consuming!

          • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            “live a shittier, lower quality life for no reason because you’re fucked anyways” why though? An environment sounds great, but it’s obviously not in the cards for us. Why purposely have a worse life? HedonismBot could teach us a thing or two tbh, if we’re gonna burn the earth to a crisp anyways might as well have fun, no?

            • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              So you want to keep being destructive because more powerful people keep being destructive? Putting my pleasure above everything and everyone else doesn’t make me happy, I’m not like that.

  • Dramaking37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Sorry, I’m freeing Palestine this election by posting on Instagram about it and not voting”

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah it’s not the “fuck everyone else let’s subsidize billionaires and crude oil some more” party that has anything to do with it; it’s definitely the “i think genocide is bad” crowd.

      • Dramaking37@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that you can think genocide is bad and when given a choice between two viable candidates pick the one that is less likely to double down on genocide. But hey, that’s just someone who has seen third parties in the US never quite achieve what they say they’re doing EVERY election.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          never argued for third party candidates; you can check my history. but blaming this bullshit on people who do rather than the party that actively and proudly wants it is also a bit single minded.

          it’s one thing to argue not voting or voting third party is the same as voting for republicans (which i always argue that it is) but seeing news like this shouldn’t make your first thought “this is because of third party voters”.

          no, it’s republicans first. and democrats second, by the way. depressing voter turnout is something they have done for as long as I’ve been aware of us politics, probably more. it’s their job to turn non-voters into democratic voters, not the republicans’ job.

          yet time and time again their best argument has always been “look at these cunts, we promise we’ll be at least 10% better”. that’s dumb. they banked on this message with Hillary and everyone paid for it.

          this is one of those rare instances where they haven’t been as patronizing and dismissive of their base. they’ve actually listened, and convinced biden to drop out, and harris picked the VP candidate favored by the voters rather than making cynically strategic plays. i hope they win and learn a lesson from this.

          • Dramaking37@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, fair enough! Thanks for taking the time to share your perspective and help me see other thinking on the issue.