• demesisx@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember rule 1, people! We can’t have any truth leaking into our aggressively-censored (lemmy.world) echo-chamber that so closely resembles the smug Reddit hive-mind that it’s hard to discern between the two!

      • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s 4 days late, but I’ll wade in.

        It’s possible to express an opinion without being an asshole about it. That’s what Rule 1 is about. Not censorship.

        I don’t like (factual) Y about country X. <- Doesn’t breach Rule 1.

        The people in country X are all shit stains <- Breaches Rule 1.

        Diplomatic honesty is fine (at least with me).
        What isn’t fine are:

        • Personal attacks,
        • Doxxing, trolling, sealioning,
        • attacks on whole groups of people because of:
          • stereotypical characteristics.
          • ingroup-outgroup bias,
          • readily disprovable dis/misinformation.

        In summary, respectful debate is welcome. Nastiness is not.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Rule 1 is: Be nice and have fun.

        Definitely censorship there. I’d add more, but that would violate rule 1.

        So instead… I hope you have the day you deserve.

        • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My point is: Rule 1 is vaguely-phrased and has been repeatedly cited as justification for censorship. ESPECIALLY here on Lemmy.world.

          “Be nice”.

          Anyone dishing out any inconvenient truths about the world can be accused of not “being nice”. It’s the perfect catch-all for censorship happy moderation.

          It might as well say, “don’t say anything that might be considered controversial by the hivemind”

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Or, just don’t be a dick. Something many users have a fundamental issue with from my experience over the last 25+ years online.

            • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Perhaps. I don’t think I’ve stepped out of line but text can be read in so many different tones.

              You ever get into a debate where the other side won’t even meet you in the middle at some source of ground truth and the reality that you have to make them aware of is impossible for them to perceive in a way that doesn’t sound threatening to their entire worldview? It happens all the time. That’s not being a dick. That’s the reality of these types of discussions. They are uncomfortable but essential for a healthy democracy.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I wasn’t directing it at you specifically, just a general commentary about the pseudo-anonymity that many internet commenters feel they have and the resulting attitudes and responses because of that. The core reason for vague generalized rules like Rule 1 is because people will be dicks, just because they can. And that manifests in hundreds of different ways that are hard to account for in a general community rule structure beyond something simple like, don’t be a dick.

                • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Ahh. Well thanks for hearing me out. I’m glad to be able to describe something that happens to me repeatedly on these types of forums.

  • Noxious@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Countries I like in no particular order: Canada, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Denmark, Switzerland, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Malta, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, New Zealand

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Demacia from Runeterra. They claim to be morally right and superior whilst also doing eugenics. Bloody bastards.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    None.

    Countries don’t have a unique identity I could like or dislike as a whole.

    They can vary widely from region to region, city to city, block to block, street to street… heck even person to person. I may not like some people, or at worst some region because of this or that reason but that is all.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate America, because that’s where I’m from and what I know the most about. If I lived in your country, I’d hate it more.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why is this posted twice by two users on two instances? OP I think you exposed your alt.

    • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Read the thread title again….

      I assure you, that other user is not me. Honestly though, who cares anyway? They’re two totally opposite questions.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I see the distinction, my mistake. Was trying to be helpful in case you double posted by accident.

        • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No problem! Thanks for the heads up even though it wasn’t true. :)

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably the ones who oppress their own people, wage war, manufacture weapons and death, spread terrorism… I’m not singling out any specific one. It’s difficult to compare which atrocity is the worst and choose a winner.

    • demesisx@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Great answer. You managed to put it in a way that can’t possibly offend while also being honest.✊

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I have no particular dislike for any country. I just don’t like some people I know personally or whose actions are known to me.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m not well-traveled internationally. Outside of America I’ve only ever been to Costa Rica, which was a great experience. I’d like to visit Belgium, Netherlands, Norway, Germany, and Canada.

    Outside of the obvious despotic and corrupt nations, I’ve watched enough Amazing Race to know that, sorry, I’ll never go to India.