Discord isn’t exactly known for generous file-sharing limits, still, the messaging app offered a 25MB limit to free users. The company has now updated its support page to reflect the upload limit for free users has been lowered to 10MB.

  • Brutticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I primarily use Discord as a one stop shop to play and run dnd campaigns. I first hopped on it around 2017, and its was way better than any other group chat app. Around the pandemic all my groups started playing on it and it became relatively seamless. I joined exactly one streamers discord but that is totally it. In general I wouldn’t expect it to be a good archive, or forum, nor do I expect it to be secure. I use armchord on PC. I started using it before it was enshittified. For what it does, it does it pretty well.

    For the record, I have used matrix and Signal. I think both have the issue that a critical mass of my friends don’t use them. I liked Signal a lot when it had SMS support. I used it as a my primary SMS app, and some of my friends had signal as well, so that was cool. now its more like a specialized messenger app, and I fucking hate having yet another one of those on my phone. Matrix encryption keys are giant stumbling blocks to my friends who do give a fuck. I play ttrpgs with some people who could not give a fuck. I would have to set up the server, set up the account, and then I would have have to do the encryption key for them. And like people say, Matrix logs you out every little while. You can turn notifications off and totally forget about it. For my non techy friends, this is literally a bridge too far.

    I literally have two friends who think Matrix is cool. No one else even has an account, much less a server. And the support to meet people who have this app is very limited. Cool, but I think it will always be a niche.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It took me a lot of convincing to get my friends on Signal instead of WhatsApp. I believe WhatsApp was talking about adding advertising or charging money, and I used that to get people to switch.

      This reminds me of the argument I see from Linux users that Linux is just as easy to set up as Windows. I think it doesn’t occur to people making that argument that most people never even set up Windows. It’s just on their computer when they get it.

      The setup needs to be fast and easy for people to consider it. Nobody will spend even 5 minutes figuring something out these days.

      Edit to add that a bunch of younger people have never had a computer or laptop. They do their computer stuff on a phone or possibly a tablet and they definitely never did anything technical like reinstall the OS.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        How do you understand this without falling into the defeatist mindset that the sheeple deserve to be imprisoned in the state of enshitification that their ignorance, laziness, and unwillingness to learn has helped build? Put down your iPhone, or go check into your local FEMA camp. I hate to be negative like this, but people really seem to be willing to give up everything for convenience and bling.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 days ago

          esstee

          People can choose what to spend their time doing. Some of us choose to be able to install operating systems, other choose to become master gardeners. Who’s to say which one is right or wrong? The gardeners probably don’t have any issues using WhatsApp, even if there is advertising in it, because it solves the problem they have. Then they go back to the thing they’re experts at instead, saying things like “why can’t these tech sheeple grow a radish? send them all to jail.”

          • joel_feila@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            You dont have to be an expert, i barely know anything about the kinux cli but i still use linux daily

            • essteeyou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              Most people have never installed an operating system, and I’ve never seen a laptop running Linux for sale at Best Buy or wherever, so there’s a huge barrier for entry for the average person.

              I’m sure most people would be fine with Linux day to day if it was set up for them, but they’re not going to download an ISO, boot from it, and install an OS if they don’t have to.

              These same people, to stick with my example, might grow delicious tomatoes, better than those you buy at the supermarket. Can anyone grow some tomatoes? Pretty much. Does anyone really have to? No.

  • Corhen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 days ago

    Unlike other platforms, we store your files for as long as you need them, so it is crucial that we manage our storage sustainably

    I mean, its great that they offer that, but all my files dont need to be permemnant. I would love the ability to review and delete old files

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah, makes no sense that they store some pdf I was dragging over to someone one time. Super inefficient. They should allocate an amount of storage per user that then rolls and deletes the oldest files when the cap gets exceeded to make room for the new files.

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    A feature that’s be nice is giving you a higher upload limit if you make your upload temporary.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Or let you host from your own machine, rather than paying Discord for the privilege of using their wildly overpriced services.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 days ago

        Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link, prevents you from getting hammered with download requests if your upload becomes popular, and allows your content to be accessed when your own machine goes to sleep or has any kind of networking interruption.

        Before discord people used to self host teamspeak or some other software. One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine, because they don’t know where you are.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link

          You don’t need the whole image, just the route to your machine to retrieve the data. Glorified Bit.ly.

          One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine

          Definitely a perk of a bulk centralized system. But the pricing model is still messed up. If Teamspeak sold you gems to buy widgets to mask your IP, I still wouldn’t pay for the service.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        I hate discord a lot, but this feature kinda destroys the reason discord exists. We used to have irc which is direct communication and needs both systems to be online ( yes, bouncers exist, but they arent perfect ). We moved away from irc so systems didnt need to be online and it was all in the cloud. Direct communication/file sharing from pc would kinda revert all that lol

        ( lets gooooo, bring irc back :p )

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      As long as cattle keeps using these white products, there will always be a merchant to sell their data.

      We clearly have poorly educated population that can’t be bothered with anything besides blind consumption of whatever is trendy.

      Plastic clothes, goyslop and data harvesting apps is essentially the condition of the modern wage slave and they appear to be satisfied.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          This is one of those things where the concept is entirely appropriate and accurate, except for that one teeny tiny minor issue…

          It’s not the Jews, it’s the WASPs and whatever weird Catholic sect/cult that Justice Barret was raised in…okay, and yes, there’s probably some Jews in the mix as well.

          Because those are the main demographic groups of the .01%

          So what’s the WASP equivalent for goy? Heathenslop?

          Edit: I’m having a hard time imagining left-wing Jews being upset at this observation. I’m guessing at least some of these down votes are done in solidarity for people of Jewish heritage… like myself.

          So…thank you and lol.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Nah, they call them “white apps” and so since they are coming from a place of racism against whites, they feel it’s totally appropriate and okay to use a term like goyslop. It’s a shitty word to use and claiming it’s okay because you are actually racist against whites is stupid as fuck. That is still using antisemitic dog whistles. There are other ways to describe the same concept like “fast food slop.”

            They think other people can’t read and don’t realize it still makes them a stupid racist.

            • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              But the concept isn’t just about fast food, it’s about the system that produces pink slime based chicken nuggets, and the people who sit up top of that system.

              So they’ve correctly identified systemic problems that hurt people, and that those actions are done with intent, either maliciously or with indifference.

              They’ve just confused capitalism working as intended, as being a Jewish conspiracy.

              Also, “white apps” is just really bad racial propaganda. Whoever coined that term needs some new blood in their marketing team.

              Regardless of who coined that phrase, I think you’re confused about WASP’s. It means White Anglo-Saxon Protestant i.e. the largest demographic group within America’s version of old money.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I recommend reporting the comment

          Definitely not the kind of shit that should be welcome in this community

          Also (after looking it up) I’m pretty sure that “goy” is a term used by jewish people to refer to non-jewish people. So in this case I think they’re saying that it is “non-jewish trash” by referring to it as “goyslop”.

          I could be wrong though, they’re pretty incoherent and it’s definitely not the kind of comment reply I wanted to see when I woke up from my nap.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Yeah, already reported it.

            And yeah, “goyim” is anyone non-Jewish, so the implication is Jews control the world and they only give out the barest minimum of sustenance to goyim known as “goyslop.”

            Like the amount of time and energy people put into these fucking slurs is ridiculous.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          High schooler Reading comprehension spotted.

          Melt down about one term that you didn’t like and ignore the message lol

          Either way my content speak for itsel, you could first do some basic diligence before spazzing out and trying to imply intent that ain’t there.

          We really so deserve the government we got with this genius

          Rheee

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          If Trump started saying this shit, he would get re elected

          But you don’t appear to have sufficient understanding of what I said, if you believe somebody like Trump would repeat this in public lol

          • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Oh. no, I’m not saying that this is something that Trump would say, it just has all the cadence of someone with early onset dementia. It is written like how he speaks, thus “Trump’s Speech Writer” and not Trump himself.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      discord on FOSS projects

      I don’t understand why this was even a thing to begin with. FOSS projects using non-FOSS platforms is kinda weird, especially platforms with unclear financial situations like Discord.

      • Kayana@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that. We don’t need to force FOSS developers to become proficient in everything.

        What needs to happen is some kind of tool (ideally FOSS) that lets you spin up an actual forum with the same difficulty to set it up as Discord.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that

          I’m not saying you have to self-host… You could still use something that’s open-source and remotely hosted.

          Sentry (error logging and bug reporting system) is like this for example. They have a hosted plan, including a generous free plan for open-source projects, but Sentry itself is open-source.

          • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            That looks like a really nice policy. But my question then becomes, what happens if the company sells out someday? What if they get bought out by a larger company, or a private equity firm? Did they take funding, and if so, how much leverage do the funders have to influence them to make money and cut out programs like this?

            It’s great to see companies trying to break that trend and I highly commend them for it! But we have already seen this pattern a million times before and it always ends due to something similar to this.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Could anyone explain the attraction of discord? To me it’s UX is atrocious.

    • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      Discord got big in online gaming because they offered a VOIP and text chat browser cliemt. Just copy or type the short link and you’re in in a minute. They also did free hosting which was huge.

      Compared to Teamspeak or Ventrilo, literally just eliminating the steps of downloading a client, installing it, and typing in an IP address caused them to explode overnight. Also you could “host” without changing router settings (most kids/students have to ask their parents or jump through hoops for this).

      Technically there was stuff like Skype but that never had the convenient team speak style chat rooms to drop in and out of freely.

      Within months of suddenly getting popular, discord had a huge userbase that everybody was using already, and that momentum got us to the point where in some aspects its even replacing the role of wiki’s and forums even though its terrible at it.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      Its really convenient if you’ve got a group of friends spread out across the country for gaming. The voice channels allow people to jump in and out at will. No calling each other. That and bots are really eady to build for it. Sure its all unencrypted but im not putting anything of real value into it.

    • Swampman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Back in 2016 I managed to get all of my gaming friends on discord simply by saying “It’s like Skype but it doesn’t suck”

      We simply needed something that worked and let us do voip calls without having to jump through the hoops of setting up ventrilo, mumble or teamspeak. Skype was so aggressively bad that any alternative was like finding a waterpark in the middle of the desert.

    • Kanda@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      My dumbass friends who work in tech thought IRC was too much of a hassle. So we ended up on dickschord

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      We’ve found it to be the “least bad option” for DnD. Have a Discord window open for everyone to video chat in, have a browser window open with Owlbear Rodeo or Foundry / Forge for your tokens and character sheets, all works smoothly enough. The text chat is sufficient for sending the DM a private message; for group chat to share art of the things you’ve just run into or organise the next session.

      Completely agree that for anything “less transient”, then the UX is beyond awful and trying to find anything historical is a massive PITA.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Google Whiteboard could have been better. Hell, I can think of a dozen apps in the Google graveyard that could have been better.

        But Discord still exists and they don’t, so…

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t get it either. They aggressively try to sell nitro, they have ads embedded in their ui. I have no idea why people don’t hate it.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      There’s no open source equivalent that does seamless audio and video streaming on every platform.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    are you fucking kidding me?? TEN MB IN 20 FUCKING 24.

    Discord is such fuckin TRASH

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      I was a member of a number of groups in a larger gaming community most of which migrated from Reddit/Mumble to Discord. It destroyed the quality and accessibility of written content and lore and I wish it had never happened. Then again, we can’t go back to reddit at this point either.

      Guess I’ll be posting my screenshots in 640x480 from now on!

    • anneiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Being part of multiple servers becomes such a painful experience with that interface…even with the “folders” and the search palette.

    • PMmeYourPenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Is there a Matrix for dummies guide? It seems difficult to get started with, finding the right client etc.

      • recapitated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s kinda like lemmy here, but a little more pain because not only do you have to pick your provider, but you also need to be very mindful of how your key pair is managed. Like… don’t just uninstall a client without going through the effort of trusting and verifying a new one first, or you may lose the ability to decrypt a lot of history and also break trust with relationships you have.

        Security first is a major concern in the system, so it doesn’t leave a lot to the imagination unfortunately.

        That said, once you convince yourself to set it up, and convince anyone else to do the same, it works pretty nicely. It’s like an inner venn diagram of discord, telegram and IRC.

      • recapitated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I also haven’t used it in a few years. Chat systems in general don’t cooperate with the way my brain works.

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’s a big lie. Why not offer the option to delete automatically after 24h if 15mb extra is so much storage?

    Or is it about bandwidth? Why no automatic compression on desktop? Oh wait, that feature existed in the past was scrapped. They think you’re fools.

  • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Beware: old files sonner or later being removed is next. People use Discord like CDN(there are even bunch of clients for that usage) and that is never going to work indefinitely. Honestly, it’s very impressive that deletion wasn’t their first choice.

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Same here, honestly. I would have thought they’d say something like “hey, we’re going to delete anything 1 year or older starting next month, and reduce that amount slowly down to 6 months with time” just to give people a general warning in case there was anything they were storing through Discord that they wanted to keep.

      There’s also just a ton of optimizations they could have done. Are people repeatedly uploading the same file, with the same name and contents? merge them into one CDN link. They’d probably save hundreds of terabytes of data just from reposted memes alone through a hash matching algorithm.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean… couldn’t they just move the old files from the hot CDN to cold storage? I bet the few people that go check at old messages care that much about the loading speed of a screenshot. And honestly I think PR wise deleting memories from people makes for worse article titles than smaller files

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I suppose they could, but even cold storage has a cost, and with the scale Discord’s operating at, they definitely have many terabytes of data that comes into the CDN every day, and that cost adds up if you’re storing it permanently.

          I also think the vast majority of users would prefer being able to upload much higher resolution images and videos, to being able to see the image they sent with their messages a year ago. I don’t often go back through my messages, but I often find myself compressing or lowering the quality of the things I’m uploading on a regular basis.

          They could also do the other common sense thing, which is to, on the client side of things, compress images and videos before sending them.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    25 MB wasn’t even enough to send a single full res screenshot of my desktop.

    Its 2024 and we still lack the basic functionality of file sharing between peers without a corp dictator restricting and snooping.

    Not that the functionality does not exist (p2p, literally) but if my grandma cant receive the family pictures its not basic.

    EDIT: it is possible i am remembering this from when it was 8MB.

    Empty desktop is just a few kb but it was not that hard to open enough stuff to exceed 10MB

    Til that i have been sending screenshots of only half my screen for not reason

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      That makes no sense. The 24MP RAW files from my camera at 25MB, no way a PNG or JPEG of a 4K (8MP) monitor are anywhere close to that big.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I did some test, i was speaking from memory so not very accurate.

        it depends on whats on screen.

        Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

        Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

        But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that file size is to big so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

    • randombullet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      No way 3,840 × 2,160x2=16,588,800 pixels 16,588,800 x 10 bits = 165,888,000 bits

      165,888,000 bits / 8 bits/byte = 20,736,000 bytes

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      That sounds like a you problem, because a PNG screenshot of my full 5120x1440 desktop is about 850 kB.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Interesting. Mine is 3840x1600 which should be ever so slightly less pixels.

        I have noticed the content does matter, is your background native resolution or mostly one color?

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          3840 * 1600 * 4B / 1024 / 1024 = 23.4375MiB for uncompressed RGBA (four bytes per pixel).

          That is, even if that thing was pure random pixels and would have to be stored uncompressed and you’d use a completely useless alpha channel you still don’t hit 25M.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            I did some test, i was speaking from memory.

            it depends on whats on screen.

            Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

            Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

            But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that files are “too powerful” so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

            So either that 25MB was a lie or i do frequently exceed it?

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I specifically opened a few apps to break up any large blocks of one color.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I kinda wish we could go back to the world of people hosting their own servers and having subsets of their homedirs on ftp urls. Of course none of that is really approachable to a lot of a people :-(.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The issue is the absence of being able to port forward in a lot of places. UPNP exists on some networks but it’s usually disabled. But if we want actual peer to peer we’re going to need to implement some way to accept incoming connections EVERYWHERE.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Gonna be real here, I’m in tech, there is no fucking way I’m gonna open my PC to the entire fucking internet. Vulnerabilities are everywhere and no code is perfect. Firewalls and nat help stop so many attacks from the start.

          Even if ipv6 is common I will assume most implementations will be nat based.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            brother, use a firewall. NAT does nothing for this, a single stateful firewall will do more for device security than a NAT existing solely by itself.

            A nat doesn’t even do anything other than provide some basic level of device anonymity. If you didn’t have a firewall it would still be accessible, you would just need to either be really good at guessing ports, or sniff for traffic that’s relevant lol.

            • Strykker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Except the NAT device will stonewall traffic on every port except the ones I open, for my entire network, and then I can just worry about securing the software listening on those few ports, instead of having to worry about the firewalls on every device I own.

              Tldr default nat behavior is a state full firewall.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                that’s literally what a stateful firewall does.

                It only allows corresponding return traffic to outgoing traffic that a device has internally sent outwards.

                if you disabled that, it wouldn’t do that. But even a NAT without a stateful firewall might end up doing this depending on how it’s configured and your open ports due to how the forwarding is handled. This is how we get around NATing for P2P traffic, though the trick is to just send two NATed users to the others ip and port at the same time to establish a connection that can “isAlive” from there. If you had no firewall you would only need to know the IP and port to do this.

                plus not to mention you can run internal firewalls on each device specifically which would do basically the same thing anyway. But then again i don’t use windows so that’s way easier.

                • Strykker@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Yes, thank you for repeating what I just said, and justifying my desire for a nat. I do infact actually know a few things about computer networks and tcp/ip since I spent 7 years writing software to interface with and monitor them.

          • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            IPv6 does not require you to open your machine to the Internet, even without making use of a NAT. Sure you get an IP that’s valid on the whole internet, but that doesn’t mean that anyone can send you traffic.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                yeah, under IPv6 based home networking, you just assign a block of addresses to a home, 512 or something, for example, and then you just use a stateful firewall to do the same exact thing that a NAT + a stateful firewall would be doing on a traditional IPv4 network.

                Nothing stops you from using a NAT if you felt like you wanted your networking to be more complicated for no reason. But you probably shouldn’t.

                There are potential benefits for the anonymization of traffic (though this is probably easy enough to defeat by simply sniffing for all traffic across the IP block) a denial of service wouldn’t be super important anymore, as you could just engage in round robin across the other IPs, unless of course you DOS’d every IP all at once, but that would be super fucking obvious and trivial to deal with. Though it might kill an individual computer in the network due to traffic influx.

                You could still engage in DHCP IP handouts, which would actually be beneficial in terms of traffic anonymization in this case. Especially on a high frequency basis. Similar to the effects of NATing on an IPv4 network.

                Plus you could still grab a static IP address per device, and then just pass through firewall rules to allow external connections or whatever you please. No forwarding required.