• Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 days ago

    Fines need to scale based on the wealth of the perpetrator. It should be an equal punishment for breaking the law.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Also, you can just mail speeding fines to people, there’s no reason to pull anyone over for that shit except to initiate a conflict.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 days ago

        They use the pull over as opportunity to search for more offenses

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        They could have said “no problem sir, we’ll get this ticket to you right away” and then slow walked the whole process. Taking up hill’s time would have caused him more problems than anything else.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      That sounds good in theory but that only hurts the middle class disproportionately. Not to mention it violates the constitution.

      • brianary@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Maybe there’s some precedent, but I can’t see why equally proportionate punishment should be unconstitutional.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Proportionate to what? Net worth? Income? If you actually think it through you are not targeting the rich by doing this. You are targeting small businesses and middle class families.

          • Soleos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            You could curve the proportion to income to scale impact to something more equitable. How you decide what’s equitable would be another problem to solve, but I imagine it would involve benchmarking around the middle class and poverty line. Right now fine rates are okay for the middle class, so keep the proportion similar, fine rates really fuck up poor people, and fine rates mean nothing to the upper class. So imagine you you feel would be a fair impact for a fine and scale it accordingly.

      • Makhno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not to mention it violates the constitution

        Almost as if relying entirely on an aged document written by the rich to set laws for the modern rich doesn’t work 🤔