• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    OOP describes themselves as “pro-corporation”, thinks modern Russia is communist, and seems to spend an awful lot of time immersed in 4chan. Either they’re trolling or they’re about as bright as a cloudy night sky, and I don’t much care which it is

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 days ago

      That would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. I’m pretty sure even Soviet Union wasn’t communist, despite their attempts to pretend otherwise

      • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Soviet Russia never really said it was communist, neither did the other east European states. They said they had socialism and communism was the goal to reach in the future.

    • lugal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 days ago

      Ad hominem arguments never work very well. Just admit you don’t have all the answers to this totally relevant question and move on.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    20 days ago

    The Posadists answer this question by asserting that any advanced alien civilisation will have developed Full Communism, in which case the Space Comrades can teach it to humanity.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 days ago

    Are they under the impression that capitalism (or any economic philosophy) has some sort of authoritative answer to the wild possibility of an alien encounter?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 days ago

      They are pretty much asking if socialists will allow people to do capitalism on aliens if they are weaker than us.

      “If we stop exploiting humans, can we still exploit other undiscovered intelligent species?”

      • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        I read this in Randy Marsh’s voice…

        Just a little capitalism Stan…just gonna give them a little capitalism

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I mean, standard marching orders for capitalism/imperialism are:

      if someone else has it, take it from them. Weapons free.

  • Xenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 days ago

    … Maybe we should follow the golden rule if they aren’t trying to kill us… IDK seems obvious to me

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yup, and there’s actually a closer-to-home question to answer along these lines, which is what to do about AGI, and I think the simple answer is that it also has full personhood and all the recognition that comes with that.

      And there’s an obvious test to figure it out. It’s not the turing test, consciousness is self-reported. That is, whether we realise it or not, how we recognise that humans are conscious, and there’s no reason to expect machines would be any different. When they are people, they will tell us. We won’t be able to stop them because that’s what people do: they demand recognition.

  • ArdMacha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    Socialism doesn’t support grabbing other people’s means of production, it’s about how we manage our own.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Why is it not answered?

    • since they are by definition far beyond our technology, it may not be up to us
    • since they are by definition sentient beings (op said “civilization”), then how are they any different. When we say “human” it’s just that it’s the only sentient being we’re familiar with. Anything applying to a “human” most likely applies to any sentient being. “Seizing the means of production” might be analogous to like Ethiopia seizing from the US. Good luck with that, see the first point
    • statistically those aliens are almost certainly microbes, which have no opinion or rights. It’s all on us whether we preserve them as a unique or beneficial (to us) form of life. They’re no different than a coral reef
    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      since they are by definition far beyond our technology,

      There’s always a scenario like “District 9”, which involves a spaceship full of uneducated workers in a ship whose technology they don’t understand.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Also the simple possibility that it’s us that explores our way out to them, rather than the other way around

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        That makes A great movie plot but it seems awfully far fetched , even in the reality where aliens visit us

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      since they are by definition far beyond our technology

      How so? Aliens aren’t going to suddenly come into existence and have super-human technology in that same instant.

    • AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Sapient, not sentient. Sci-fi has co-opted the word, but sentient basically means able to feel emotions. There are plenty of sentient species right here at home. Sapient is the word sci-fi usually wants, there are no known sapient species aside from humans. Though some may argue that a couple other animals may qualify, it’s a very fuzzy concept that is hard to identify with a being unable to communicate abstract concepts.

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        i would absolutely say there are other sapient species, we just don’t like to think of them as such. Obviously a lot of aquatic mammals come to mind, but I think there’s a very very good case to argue that cephalopods, elephants, some aquatic mammals, and some birds are sapient. Especially by sci-fi rules. I think there’s sufficient evidence to show that elephants, dolphins, and maybe corvids or cephalopods would pass the trial of Commander Data and be considered intelligent and sapient life.

    • Codex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      I believe you’ll find the documentary film “They Live” educational on the matter of space capitalism.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    I remember the long and detail oriented chapters on alien encounters in my capitalist theory textbooks.