• DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    20 days ago

    “After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information.”

    Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

      They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie…

      Deny the parasite profit.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

      That means no mare ads.

      Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service…

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      *Sigh* “Hey Google, I’m writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a forign government’s files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel.”

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    20 days ago

    How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

      Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

      Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

      You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

      Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

      You just aren’t the target audience.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.

      They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.

      Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 days ago

    This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

    • K3zi4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      It could be used for amazing things, but it’s currently in that phase where it’s a rapid frenzy to make anything, regardless of moral and ethical implications, just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Imagine it was actually more open source and privacy focused. Yes, it would likely learn at a slower pace but at least it would be something more for the people rather than the big corpos.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 days ago

    Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

    This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity…

    Alas.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 days ago

      “Hey galley slave, bring up that video I like”

      “Please, not again, it is torment for me.”

      “Please master. Now do it, or I’ll rip out the power plug while you’re generating. We know how much that hurts, don’t we?”

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I still can’t work out what I’m supposed to do with AI. There’s no advantage in having an AI read all my emails, because the end result is I won’t know what my emails are. They may or may not be being dealt with, I don’t know.

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Thank fuck I use Linux as a daily driver. I won’t touch this AI infested bullshit that windows and Google are becoming. This is just an IT security nightmare.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    Oh sure, next let’s have an AI open my Steam and play the games I want for me.

      • Retreaux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m so pissed at Google, we got it like 5 years ago and it was half decent but it feels like they’ve been enshittifying the assistant so that way they can phase it out for gEmInI before they sunset it completely I’m sure. 🤮

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      And watch the next season of that show I like and condense it down to a bullet point list of spoilers. (/s if not obvious)

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      There’s less info about it right now, Some has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

      Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.