• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Shortly after Hightower’s casting, however, the student was replaced when the school’s principal, Scott Johnston, called Hightower’s father about a new gender policy for student performers.

    “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

    This sounds like the kind of thing a school would do under the Nazis. I wonder why that is.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 months ago

      What the fuck?

      “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

      When I was in school, they literally didn’t have enough students who were good enough to act, so there was so much gender bending. What garbage

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        During shakespeares time, they did not allow female actors, so all women on stage were played by men.

        Shakespeare had men acting in skirts and dresses. Juliet of Romeo and Juliet, a 14 year old girl was played by a man. The kissing between the Capulet heiress and the Montague boy were two men smooching on stage.

        Repugnicans are a plague on both your houses (of Parliament)!

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

      These people are so fucking clueless. Men playing women in theatre is literally as old as theatre because women literally weren’t allowed to.

    • Case@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also how that spits in the face of theatrical performances dating at least back to Shakespeare’s time, if not further.

      I never studied that stuff, but I did date a drama major back in the day.

    • morgan423@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bet if you asked him if he was a Bob’s Burgers fan, he’d say yes and not be bothered at all that two of the lead female characters are played by men.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Our culture” (mostly western European) does not care if men play women (or vice-versa) in a play. If anything, like other have mentioned, in condones it. Stop acting like what you believe is the arbiter of culture. What you believe is nothing and meaningless, and a minority in our society.

          Even if you were correct (which you absolutely are not), it wouldn’t matter because we don’t have to continue doing and believing the same things that were once believed. We can imagine and create a better world that let’s people be what they want and be happy. We don’t need you to agree to it, but it’d be better if you at least weren’t hostile to people trying to live their lives and not bothering you.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            we don’t have to continue doing and believing the same things that were once believed. We can imagine and create a better world that let’s people be what they want and be happy. We don’t need you to agree to it, but it’d be better if you at least weren’t hostile to people trying to live their lives and not bothering you.

            Wise words.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              So we should allow children to read books that are accepting of relationships at all, right? It’s either wrong to do or it isn’t. It shouldn’t matter what gender the people are in the relationships. Either you’re OK with some types of indoctrination or none.

              (I’m of the opinion it isn’t indoctrination to let people choose to read what they choose to read. It isn’t indoctrination to admit people exist.)

        • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then they can just, you know, “not expose their child to that lifestyle” and stop forcing other people to do what their theocracy says?

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          LGBT isn’t a choice and covering their eyes won’t change their sexual orientation.

          But, besides that point, how the fuck is it okay to insulate your kid from other cultures? That’s not healthy at all. Eating ramen wasn’t part of my family’s culture growing up, either, but I don’t go around trying to prevent children from learning about Japanese food.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You mean they do hate it but want to claim respectability points by gesturing to “muh kultor!”

          Queer folks are in every culture because they literally just happen everywhere. It ain’t up to some badnik lowdowns to decide it ain’t in their culture because it sure is when they’re kicking little johny on the street for not wanting to be called jessy anymore.

    • scripthook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I remember correctly back in the 18th century when only men were in plays they would also play women.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth. Is just the next step, the Nazi’s have been coming for us but they weren’t you so you didn’t stand up.

      Over the last two years it was about fictional characters being played by people not of the characters race, and voice actors started losing work because they weren’t the same race as the characters being voiced.

      Before that it was wrong coloured fictional live action princesses.

      Before that it was wrong coloured actors using disguises and make-up.

      Before that it was black-face.

      And everyone thought, I’m not racist maybe that should be wrong! And now you’re racist, sexist, bigoted, for daring to have the admiration and respect to want to imitate ‘those people’. This is part of the culture war, they want to make sure you stay within your lines, on your rung, and in your place.

      FIRST THEY CAME
      By Martin Niemöller
      First they came for the Communists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Communist
      Then they came for the Socialists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Socialist
      Then they came for the trade unionists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a trade unionist
      Then they came for the Jews
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Jew
      Then they came for me
      And there was no one left
      To speak out for me.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I really don’t think enough people realize this shit leads to “women can’t wear pants,” (would fit the statutes they pass to ban drag) which inevitably rolls back nearly all progress we’ve made in the past century regarding women in the workplace.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Or gay and trans people not being allowed to portray men and women, or straight people from portraying gay or trans people.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            or keep straight people from portraying gay or trans people.

            Except no. If they were consistent, then yeah sure. But there’s nothing consistent about this ideology.

            They wouldn’t care about that. But more importantly, art containing gay or trans people is “degenerate,” and would never be made in the first place (or if made, its creators would be killed).

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Not quite sure if I’m reading you right, but I’d say there’s a relevant difference between those examples, like recommending white people don’t act in blackface, which are about respecting the cultural sensitivities of a traditionally oppressed group, and those, like prohibiting trans kids from acting roles of their own gender, which are about enhancing the oppression of a traditionally oppressed group.