After a devastating advertiser exodus last week involving some of the world’s largest media companies, X owner Elon Musk is suing the progressive watchdog group Media Matters over its analysis highlighting antisemitic and pro-Nazi content on X — a report that appeared to play a significant role in the massive and highly damaging brand revolt.

The lawsuit filed Monday accuses Media Matters of distorting how likely it is for ads to appear beside extremist content on X, alleging that the group’s testing methodology was not representative of how real users experience the site.

“Media Matters knowingly and maliciously manufactured side-by-side images depicting advertisers’ posts on X Corp.’s social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content and then portrayed these manufactured images as if they were what typical X users experience on the platform,” the complaint filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas said. “Media Matters designed both these images and its resulting media strategy to drive advertisers from the platform and destroy X Corp.”

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        The whole point of conservatives stacking the courts for decades has been to reach a point when they could win with the most flimsy, immoral, and unethical of reasoning (e.g. conservative logic).

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      East TX courts are the go to for Republicans and companies. They are notorious for handing favorable verdicts to them. Especially on things like this.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You think Apple & Disney didn’t verify this for themselves before ditching Twitter?

    This dumb-ass is going to be proven to be a bigot in a US court of law, isn’t he?

    “Media Matters knowingly and maliciously manufactured side-by-side images depicting advertisers’ posts on X Corp.’s social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content and then portrayed these manufactured images as if they were what typical X users experience on the platform,” the complaint filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas said. “Media Matters designed both these images and its resulting media strategy to drive advertisers from the platform and destroy X Corp.”

    The counter-suit for this claim is going to be 🧑‍🍳💋

    • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Damn if only there was a way for bud to prevent ads from appearing next to Nazis on his platform 😆

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You think Apple & Disney didn’t verify this for themselves before ditching Twitter?

      They might have. It would be great if they file a brief with the court to support the argument. I’m pretty sure that Musk is absolutely going to tear through Media Matter’s search history and say some bullshit like “Yeah, if you search for Nazi 10,000 times and Apple 10,000 times, we’re absolutely going to do the thing you asked. But the number of people who actually do that is few and Media Matters made it sound like it was everyone.”

      Media Matter’s is going to absolutely need others joining in to provide other sources of information independent of them. That’ll make the almost inevitable argument from Musk that “Nazi + Apple is a rare thing” incredibly weak.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Apple and Disney won’t be filing a brief with the court. Apple and Disney are going to get a subpoena.

        Because Musk is arguing that Media Matters was the only user that saw those ads next to racist content. So naturally Apple and Disney will need to be asked, “If only a single user saw your ads next to racist content, would you continue running ads on that platform?”

        That’s not a question they want to answer in public. So they are going to be pressuring Musk to drop the lawsuit.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, if you search for Nazi 10,000 times and Apple 10,000 times, we’re absolutely going to do the thing you asked. But the number of people who actually do that is few and Media Matters made it sound like it was everyone.

        Don’t believe your lying eyes said the Malignant Narcissist.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ah yes, the ever-popular argument that “the problem isn’t that we’re a Nazi platform, the problem is that people are pointing out that we’re a Nazi platform”.

    • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      Translation: Everyone absolutely must listen to what I have to say and I absolutely have the right to make others shut up the fuck up so they can listen to what I have to say. It is what I call freedom!!!

  • Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    X has gotten so bad…any comments section it seems is full of troll farm accounts for Republican fascist ideology. Lately there have been a bunch of memes about how J6 was just a left wing hoax to make Republicans look bad. It’s insane, I watched J6 unfold in disbelief on like 3 live news channels- the fact that they are claiming this is just demonstrably false. Free speech is not protected if it is hate speech, or if it is libelous, and most pertinent - if it is posted on a private company’s forum, so misinformation should be labeled as such or removed. Trump has proven a lack of critical thinking skills is another pandemic in this country and they cannot be allowed to return to power.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.”

      In real time… fucking a! George Orwell was a something else.

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Actually he released this statement admitting that it did happen, but wants us to think he’s been wronged because someone curated a feed then hit refresh a bunch of times, and only a couple of people saw it, so it doesn’t count.

      And by this CNN report it sounds like he’s now misrepresenting their own findings.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah. That statement isn’t doing him any good.

        If 50 out of 5.5 billion were odds to win the mega jackpot lottery, sure. The chances seem insignificant and super low.

        The problem is, 5.5 billion numbers are being rolled every day and 50 people out of a much smaller selection pool are going to win. So, if X has a total of 2000 advertisers that give a shit about ad placement, someone has a high chance of winning. Multiple times.

        The actual odds are based off of the total number of advertisers and are only loosely based on total ad impressions. Here is what I mean: Every tweet, antisemitic or not, will be close to an ad and not all advertisers care where their ads land. If you find a Nazi, you will find an ad.

        You can start doing the math about the actual distance a tweet is from an ad and stuff. Whatever.

        This is the important bit: 50 out of 5.5 billion was just what Media Matters showcased and absolutely does not show the entire problem. It’s much worse.

          • remotelove@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s less about statistics and more about deception in my opinion. Numbers are almost always meaningless in papers that excessively use bold type and underlined words.

            The function of the paper wasn’t to prove anything. It was to get idiots focused on its false concept of freedom of speech. Even if my math assumptions are wrong, it doesn’t matter and was never the point of the paper.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          He’s apparently saying they “manufactured images” in the lawsuit which is a weird way of describing “refreshed until our system natively generated this.”

              • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                That’s how Tesla won their most recent case with an autopilot failure. They acknowledge that the car did indeed drive itself into a tree. But that the company did not knowingly sell a defective product as they routinely update the vehicle.

                That wasn’t the argument that won the day for them, but it was the argument that allowed them to start on a way more technical footing that would allow them to misdirect the court to focus more on any driver impairments.

                Musk’s lawyers are insanely good at misdirection, they are some of the best at this one particular thing. Additionally, the case was file in an incredibly friendly court to Musk, so it’s likely the Judge will be willing to go down the rabbit hole of insanely technical arguments while losing sight of the more broad questions.

                There is a lot stacked up against Media Matters here.

                • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  All good points, except then they were on defense. Now they’re on offense trying to accuse someone else of malicious harm, when all MM did was create a new profile, then follow accounts and refresh. Sure, it was an abnormal amount of times unless you’re a caffeinated doomscroller, but otherwise they didn’t fake or insert anything. So it would seem like MM is on at least as good of defense footing here. Maybe.

        • remotelove@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Even that is wrong though. Every few posts, Nazi or not, is going to have an ad next to it. The numbers they are talking about are mostly irrelevant.

          The statement from exTwitter is not showing total numbers. It’s only referencing against what Media Matters showcased.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        “We think free speech is important unless that speech is being mean to us” is the biggest crybaby bullshit in the world.

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    alleging that the group’s testing methodology was not representative of how real users experience the site.

    Now all he has to proof is that somehow Media Matters has a vastly different view of X than anyone else. Good luck with that, Elon. ,-)