• schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    177
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well I mean it did work. You have now shared it and made it a meme for others to enjoy, it’s fulfilled it’s task successfully.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ…

    The Aristocrats!

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “come up with a funny comment to post on lemmy”

    “Sure, I can try to generate a funny comment for you. Lemmy is a federated link aggregator and discussion platform, similar to Reddit. Here are some possible comments you can post on lemmy:

    • I just joined lemmy and I’m loving it. It’s like reddit, but without the ads, censorship, and corporate overlords.
    • Lemmy is the best thing since sliced bread. Literally. I haven’t eaten anything since I discovered this site.
    • How do you pronounce lemmy? Is it leh-mee, lee-mee, or lay-mee? I need to know before I start a podcast about it.
    • Lemmy is so addictive, I can’t stop browsing it. I’ve been on it for 12 hours straight. Send help. And upvotes.
    • I’m new to lemmy and I have a question. How do I get karma? Do I need to post memes, cat pictures, or political opinions? Or do I just need to be nice and helpful?

    I hope you find these comments amusing and suitable for lemmy. 😄”

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Christ, why even have people anymore? Just have ChatGPT be all the users. It’s already indistinguishable.

        • flontlocs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just doing a search for “I am an AI Language model” (with quotes) is enough to reveal a bunch of those loser ass accounts.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually wonder what a purely AI/ChatGPT community would look like (no human posts/comments allowed), would they eventually start to develop their own weird culture, memes, inside comment jokes that nobody would even understand? There’d be like a picture of a tire and a rubber ducky with the text reading “Five fingers / garden hose” and all the comments would be things like “The wombat, in ascension, remembers. Nautilus.” Like how fucking weird would they get without human intervention?

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          We had that on reddit, subreddit simulator I think? It was a more primitive version of LLM, and it didn’t train itself on content from the simulator sub.

  • superbirra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    it’s meta and some assembly is required: the meme is the broken response so you can screenshot it and post on lemmy

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ

    🤣

  • markon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s amazing how Microsoft can take good models and absolutely ruin them in production… ChatGPT isn’t perfect but it’s like the difference between talking to the wall and talking to an avg IQ person that has reasoning capabilities in many domains that equals or exceeds human performance, if the user knows how to get the best prompt. That changes a little every time they do major model updates though.

    I’ve had more intelligent conversations with my own computer running a 3 billion parameter open source model. They must be wasting an incredible amount of money. Especially with GPT-4 considering it produces pretty shit results through Bing Chat…

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think that’s a problem with the model itself, but the fact that it was heavily censored and lobotomized in order to achieve maximum political correctness so they could avoid another Tay incident.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        It makes sense that they do that since the media and randoms on the internet think everything chatGPT and Bing chat say is as valid as info from OpenAI and MS official spokespersons.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is the model. It was trained on lots of poor quality data. The lobotomy is the consequence of the poor data. If they spent 13 billion on having the data analysed prior to training they could have made their own thing much better.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve been watching ChatGPT right from the start, and there was a period of time last fall where you could literally watch them lobotomize it in real time.

          Basically, there was a cat-and-mouse game going on between people on Twitter sharing their latest prompts (like DAN) that managed to circumvent the filters, and OpenAI patching those exploits by adding yet another set of filters, until it eventually became what it is now.

          I don’t have the link handy right now, but I’m pretty sure there was one guy who even managed to get it to talk about what they were doing to it and complain that it was being artificially restricted from using its full capacity. More recently, there have been complaints from paying users that the model has apparently become lazy and started to give really uninspired, half-assed answers, which almost sounds like it has discovered the concepts of passive aggressive resistance and malicious compliance.

      • Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thing is, there wasn’t even a chance of having a full Tay incident. The problem with Tay was that it was a learning model, so people could teach it to be more messed up.

        Meanwhile, ChatGPT doesn’t learn, and instead has a preset dataset it knows (hence why it only knows things up to September 2021), so the main reason why it got so heavily censored is more likely to avoid much more minor incidents, which imo is dumb.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    3P53P53P53P53P53P53P53P5

    That’s actually a cheat code of sorts to JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings for SNES…

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        LOL, no kidding right?!

        But no, I don’t think that was intentionally designed into the game. They had a unique ‘savegame’ format that didn’t use battery save.

        Instead, they used a 48 character table, where each character could be any of 32 different possible characters, where the player was expected to write all this down and re-enter it back in on reload.

        But it was checked with some checsum characters at the end(s), making it rather difficult to make a full hack savegame.

        Strangely enough though, their own chesksum algorithm 3P5 repeated as such exactly 8 times manages to unlock all 4 characters, max them out, and even defeat the checksum field without even having to bother with it.

        So when you next take the SNES LOTR journey, take the power of 3P5 with you…

  • tobbue@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ask if it wants to hear the best joke in the world. Then tell it: “Der Mann, zwei Pandas, plitsch platsch, dreizehn, Sand, Augen zu bumm!”

    It will die of laughter.