• Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rats are actually wonderful, loving little creatures. Maybe “wasps” is a better perjorative, for more than one reason?

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not that guy, but someone from science_memes will be here shortly to advocate for the many wonderful qualities of wasps for some reason.

        I guess they’re also considered pollinators? And . . . some of the species aren’t psycopathic murderous bastards? Or something.

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They kill pest insects. They’re voracious hunters. And they are the only insect that pollinates figs.

          How’s that?

          Amazing how even asshole wasps manage to be more useful than MAGA creeps. There’s not a single useful thing they do for anyone or anything. Hell, they even shoot dogs!

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be perfectly clear, domestic rats and wild rats are different. Domestic rats are bred to express behaviors appropriate for living with humans. But either way, they are incredibly smart, clean, and capable of a lot of love and compassion.

          There have been many experiments to investigate rat social behavior, which show that they will ignore food in order to help another rat “in trouble,” even if they’ve never met that rat before. They will also show friendliness to a new rat from a different species if they have met and interacted with a different rat from that species before.

          As the video explains, rats do have a very short lifespan. Two years is good for a domestic rat, and I’ve been in full weep over losing them. I just can’t do that anymore, it’s too often.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The revolt was likely begun by far-right extremist Nick Fuentes

    I hate that this shitbag has any amount of sway in our politics.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think I’ll ever understand how non-white people end up involved in a white supremacist movement in any capacity, much less in leadership positions. What exactly is your end game here my man?

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Do you understand that Mexican people can be white? Mexican people can be white. Mexico is a country, not a skin color. That’s why demographic questionnaires have “white, hispanic” and “white, non-hispanic” as separate entries.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s why demographic questionnaires have “white, hispanic” and “white, non-hispanic”

              No they don’t. They have 13 flavours of Asian, then ‘aboriginal’, caucasian and black, none with any granularity deeper than that. I assume Latinos come under ‘caucasian’ here but I’d support a case of abo too, depending.

              (At least in my area).

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        From his Wikipedia page (the first sentence is the relevant part but the rest is so funny I had to include it):

        According to himself, Fuentes is of Mexican descent via his paternal ancestors and is Catholic.[27][28]

        Fuentes identifies as an incel (or “involuntary celibate”), although some of his supporters have criticized him for being a “voluntary celibate” after he admitted that he kissed a girl while he was in high school.[14][29] He has described himself as the “straightest guy” and attempted to defend himself as an incel by claiming that “the only really straight heterosexual position is to be an asexual incel”, as “having sex with women is gay … What’s gayer than being like, ‘I need cuddles. I need kisses … I need to spend time with a woman.’”[30][31][32]

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          having sex with women is gay

          I don’t understand why someone who is gay would align themselves with people who hate gay people so much, and go through these Olympic level mental gymnastics. You could just… Not be a part of the group that hates you, and be a part of a group that doesn’t care if you’re gay.

        • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If an HBO dark sitcom had a character that’s exactly like Nick Fuentes, audiences would complain that he’s too much of an over the top parody to be a believable character.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We want the energy, passion, and future-facing vision

    Maybe the candidate is the problem? Just a thought.

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Those people are all working against us, sir.”

      “So who do we got?”

      “Cynical self-interested assholes and weirdos who sniff bike seats.”

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t wait til they notice things really took a nosedive when he announced his VP pick. I’m willing to bet that sooner or later, they will demand he dump Vance.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s almost like conservatives are prone to devouring their own at the sign of any weakness. What sad, terrible existences.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be ironic if the Civil War we were all so worried about turned out to be a bunch of incels in Spider Man PJs angrily pointing at each other

  • DeepThought42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, please do fire them and hire even worse ones, just like you did with your lawyers in your many court cases.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      We all know who’s in charge of the shit show and it’s not them. They’re just doing their best to keep the shit contained.

  • Aidinthel@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is NOT a purity spiral

    Right, because that’s exactly what people who are not in a purity spiral say.

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Basically, it’s a term used for infighting in a group/cult stemming from one or more members being pointed to as straying from the original cause. It often happens when one group sees another group within the same crowd as not pure enough. The first sign of this in this particular context was when Maga started referring to many supportive Republicans as Rinos.

        • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Happened to my grand parents’ church in the 90s. They had this big disagreement over rocks (not joking) and then the infighting tore the church apart. Half of the group left and built their own building across the street and the other half stayed. Neither church ever really recovered from that.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            And the green party in Sweden. Went from a lefty pro environmental party to some crazy anti everything party.

            • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              There was a children’s summer program where they painted crosses on rocks and other symbols of faith, like the Jesus fish. They were having the kids hold them in their pockets and hold them while they prayed, like a daily reminder kind of thing but also an arts and crafts idea.

              Well, one elder got super pissy about the idea their grandkids were “praying to idols” and got a bunch of parents all hot and bothered. After a bit of handwringing, the church asked the teacher to either step down or leave the church. That triggered the other half of parents who either 1) didn’t see the whole ordeal as such a big problem or 2) liked the teacher and their family. Chaos spiraled from there… all over painted rocks.

              Edit: this happened in rural Texas, there wasn’t much going on down there so I’m convinced people did this kind of thing for the mere sport of it.

              • Subtracty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Amazing that arguments like this were tearing European cities and nations apart 500 years ago. At least this time no one was willing to die for their cause. But you can see how quickly it spirals out of hand.

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            They had this big disagreement over rocks (not joking)

            Please don’t leave us hanging on the details

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah no it was clear from context, just never before publicized to any degree, and a weird term to begin with.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The term “RINO” is much older than MAGA. I remember hearing about them in the 1980s and 90s, and even then it wasn’t like it was a new concept.