• ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Thank goodness they’re too big to fail or they might actually be held accountable for building such shit equipment over the last decade+.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I dunno man, part of me wants to buy the dip. They’re “too big to fail,” they’ll get enough corporate welfare to bounce back. The question is when.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Na this has been an unprecedented scale of fuckups. Dont make investment decisions like timing the market. Make investment decisions based off the quality, scalability and value of the company itself. Warren Buffet 101.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Okay so they are stuck then. Right?

    Wouldn’t it be interesting if they make it back safely on the X snap dragons capsule thing and then they bring back the boing capsule and it burns up? It mean, if nothing happens it’s okay, but If it does!?

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Imagine you’re stuck in space… and your two options for getting home are Boeing and SpaceX. Is OceanGate going to branch out into space travel next? I hope these brave souls make it home safely.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      As much as I detest SpaceX and the literal child in charge of the company, their craft at least has a track record of safely bringing astronauts to and from the ISS. Boeing doesn’t even have that.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        SpaceX is Shotwell’s company, and she’s way more capable of driving success than the fuckstick who does their PR. It’s difficult to dismiss the objectively astounding leaps in technical progress that the engineers at SpaceX have achieved.

        Musk could take a long walk off a short bridge and it wouldn’t affect SpaceX’s operations at all.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          I know you all like to think that Musk does nothing at SpaceX, but that’s not the case. He is heavily involved with Starship, and he was involved with F9 in the past. For example, landing on barges was his push, same as pushing to use stainless steel for Starship.

          Whenever someone working at SpaceX says hes involved though, you all just dismiss it as “they don’t want to lose their job”

          Shotwell runs the day to day though, he’s not involved with that.

          • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            In business, just like in war, the few take credit for the work and will of the many.

            We remember Eisenhower, not the millions who died and sacrificed their life fighting for him.

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              We do remember those people… there’s a huge WWII memorial in DC and memorials around the country. The Korean War has a great memorial in DC too, great statues.

              Dwight Eisenhower apparently has a small memorial as well. I had to look it up to find it. The first review says:

              We just happened to find this memorial while waiting for our timed entry into the Air and Space Museum.

              So, who is remembered more?

                • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  You made the comparison between one person and a million. I quote:

                  We remember Eisenhower, not the millions who died

          • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            same as pushing to use stainless steel for Starship.

            Which he totally didn’t do because he’s a fucking moron who likes stainless steel, nooo this is definitely a sign that his contributions are meaningful

            • Bimfred@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              It’s stronger than aluminium, as well as easier to manufacture and work in less-than-ideal conditions than carbon fiber. Useful traits when your end goal is to build a whole fuckton of the biggest, most capable, fully reusable rockets in history.

              • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Don’t worry, if SS ends up being a failure for any reason they’ll blame him, but if it succeeds they’ll be silent or say it was dumb luck or he had nothing to do with it.

          • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            I remember hearing a podcast story - maybe the Economist? - punctuated with Elon personally canceling the weekend for all of SpaceX by screaming commands at the shift supervisor of the launch platform at night on a Friday.

            Everyone dutifully and instantly canceled their plans and worked through the weekend and in fact made great progress.

            So I don’t believe all the convenient hype that he is not involved.

      • corroded@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I feel the same as you, but you really can’t deny the fact that the engineers at his various companies have managed to design some really great tech despite their CEO.

        Not just spacecraft either. Starlink is really the first usable satellite broadband, and Tesla has mastered the art of putting advanced powertrain in terrible automobiles.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Those companies have people whose unofficial job is to manage the child when he throws a tantrum and somewhat isolate him from things that could be damaged. Twitter didn’t have this protection.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        They’ve been transporting American space personal since at least March

        Not sure what could have changed since, but when US/Russia relations at some of the worst levels in history, I’m surprised this last lingering relationship has held out as long as it has.

        • voluble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          My understanding is that, in retaliation to US sanctions imposed at the start of the invasion of Ukraine, Russia stopped providing RD-180 rocket engines that were used in the Atlas V. My surprise is that the USA relied on Russian rocket engines to put national security payloads into space.

          • mercano@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            The use of Russian engines on the Atlas dates back to a Clinton program after the collapse of the USSR. With the Soviet Union no longer able to pay its rocket scientists, it was thought that it was better that the United States pay them for their expertise rather than some other more hostile government gain access to their knowledge.

            • voluble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Interesting. Thanks for the info! I love learning about this stuff.

              In case you know - was there some sort of exclusivity agreement the USA had for their Russian rocketry purchases? What would have prevented the Russia from sharing their info with whoever they wanted, while still selling to the USA? Or was this agreement guided by political norms? Was the Clinton program named? I’d like to learn more about it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        That wouldn’t work even a little bit. Not just because spacesuits aren’t heat resistant so you’d burn up on reentry, but because they don’t have enough ∆V to slow down from orbital velocity in the first place.

        You’d be like Jebediah in my Kerbal Space Program campaign, floating around the planet without a spacecraft indefinitely.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I hate Musk but he is not the one who designed the Falcon rockets and capsule which have the best track record. I would much prefer to go on one of those than Starliner.

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m surprised NASA is letting SpaceX help them. I thought they were gonna say “I’ll do it myself” and twiddle their thumbs for a few more months.