• yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      4 months ago

      Gods I cannot wait for her to lose, she’s a POS through and through, Dems need a better candidate.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think she’s an awful choice tactically and have little hope for what her administration would do - but I’ll still vote for her if her name is on the ticket.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          She began on a progressive platform with a side of identity politics. She sold out her progressive platform during the campaign to position herself for, then secure the VP nomination.

          But, we don’t need specifics to be certain any given US federal politician is absolute trash. They’re all elected on corporate money.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ideologically, she’s a corporate shill that incarcerated thousands of people for minor posessions and then claimed to be against such policies while never offering any amnesty or apology. Politically I have major disagreeances with both parties platforms. Socially, I think Harris leads to some Republican bullshit scheme.

          Also, to everyone that keeps trying to gaslight America. EVERYONE HATES HARRIS, SHE WILL DRIVE AWAY ON THE FENCE VOTERS AND YOUNGER APATHETIC VOTERS.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ideologically, she’s a corporate shill that incarcerated thousands of people for minor posessions and then claimed to be against such policies while never offering any amnesty or apology. Politically I have major disagreeances with both parties platforms. Socially, I think Harris leads to some Republican bullshit scheme.

          Also, to everyone that keeps trying to gaslight America. EVERYONE HATES HARRIS, SHE WILL DRIVE AWAY ON THE FENCE VOTERS AND YOUNGER APATHETIC VOTERS.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They’re all pieces of shit, you don’t come to lead a political party without being one. But we’ve still got to pick which is the least smelly piece of shit of the bunch.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m eager for dems to see we won’t put up with trash anymore. No more slightly better republicans, we deserve better.

    • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      As far as backups go, she’s far from the worst. On that note, what would America do if Biden were re-elected and simply stepped down immediately? Would America lament the second term that never was or would they simply say “oh, weird. Whatever.” Or would they celebrate fresher blood finally finding its way into the mix? I know republicans would attempt to block and/or complain about everything, but the reasonables- how would they react?

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        On that note, what would America do if Biden were re-elected and simply stepped down immediately?

        I know republicans would attempt to block and/or complain about everything, but the reasonables- how would they react?

        Assuming the Republicans still hold the House, they would ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS!

        Sure, President Harris would still be a Democrat and control the Executive branch, but her new VP would be voted in by the House of Representatives. They’d try to put Trump in as VP. Having Trump (even as the junior in the Executive Branch) would give him access and power to spoil President Harris’s agenda.

        “Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.” - source is The Constitution of the United States specifically the 25th Amendment

        Alternatively, again assuming Republicans keep the house, they could make Trump the Speaker of the House.

        “The Constitution does not explicitly require the speaker to be an incumbent member of the House of Representatives, although every speaker thus far has been, and as a member the speaker also represents their district and retains the right to vote.” source

        I hate these two possible scenarios of VP or Speaker.

        On that note, what would America do if Biden were re-elected and simply stepped down immediately?

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s so wild to me that one of your two political parties is actively trying to dismantle your democracy and everyone continues on as if it’s normal.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think a Trump VP is inconceivable - if it came down to that Harris would likely just continuously nominate random democrats and leave the position vacant.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            At which point political assassination becomes a real concern as the next in line is Mike Johnson.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Realistically, if Biden were re-elected then Democrats would almost certainly win the handful of seats needed to control the House.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think he’s capable of making up the difference.

      She has higher potential. But she could also do worse, which doesn’t really matter.

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    NYTimes reporting the call wasn’t anything exciting.

    Vice President Kamala Harris tried to buck up the Democratic Party’s biggest donors on Friday, telling about 300 of them that there was little to worry about in President Biden’s campaign.

    Ms. Harris spoke to the group at a time of extraordinary turmoil among Democrats, with many hoping that she will replace Mr. Biden as the party’s nominee. But several listeners said they found the meeting overall to be of little value and even, at times, condescending, believing that the message ignored donors’ legitimate concerns about the Biden-led ticket.

    Ms. Harris, of course, is in a delicate position: She must demonstrate loyalty to her boss but also be prepared to jump immediately to the top of the Democratic ticket if Mr. Biden were to withdraw.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s been kind of maddening, seeing the discourse about her electability go from zero to hero. US politics makes no sense outside of corporate and wealthy circles. She is way more electable than Biden.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are, potentially valid, concerns that her being brown, a prosecutor, and a her makes her less electable than the ancient white man nobody likes. I think people for whom this is a problem were never going to vote dem anyway, but I can see what they perceive the problem is.

  • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why is everyone acting as if she’s an heir or something? All delegates to the convention have already been elected. If Biden steps down, they can vote for whoever, and Dem party rules state that the superdelegates can’t jump in until the 2nd vote if no one wins the first.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I heard somewhere that all the money raised for the Biden/Harris campaign would stay with Harris if she ran for president.

      I don’t know if that’s true, or what would happen to the money if they both drop out but I heard someone say that.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is absolutely not true. The DNC can do whatever the fuck they want with presidential campaign money. It’s a donation to a private organization. There’s no contract unless a big donor insists.

        • Uli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s an oversimplification. The Biden campaign has around $240 million on hand. If Harris becomes the presidential nominee, her campaign inherits the entire $240 mil.

          If another person becomes the nominee, the Biden campaign could refund contributions so they can be sent to the new campaign directly. Otherwise, they are permitted to transfer as much as they want to the DNC.

          But the DNC can’t spend the money however they like. They can spend an unlimited amount supporting the new candidate independently (running ads, oppo research, etc), but there is a limit to how much they can spend in coordination with the campaign. For example, if they rent a venue for the candidate, that must be coordinated with the campaign and therefore counts towards coordinated expenditures. The coordinated expenditure limit per presidential cycle is $32.3 million.

          And if they want to give directly to the campaign, that is even more limited. A political committee can only give $5,000 dollars per campaign per election cycle. Anything more than that would have to go to some kind of Super PAC which also has limits in what it can do in direct coordination with a campaign (though it gets fuzzier because Super PACs are tantamount to political money laundering in my opinion).

          So no, if the DNC gets the money, they can’t just give it to whatever campaign they like. The limitations are not due to any contractual obligation when donating the funds, but rather US political rules on how presidential campaigns are allowed to receive money.

          Source: https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-07-19/what-happens-to-bidens-campaign-money-if-he-drops-out

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “We realized the reason voters want Biden to step down is because Harris is his running mate. So we replaced her with the only Democrat in existence less popular than Biden, and the only person in existence to have lost to the Toupee in an election: Hillary Clinton. It’s her turn.” - Dem leadership.

  • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    They both need to step aside, it’s better to have an unknown than a known candidate that people don’t like.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Can you show an election where that strategy has worked this late in the game?

        To my knowledge the President and vice President haven’t stepped down from a political campaign. However, I can point to a situation in which a vice president took over for an unpopular president and lost. That would be Hubert Humphrey in 1968.

        Additionally, just based on logic alone, it is ridiculous to insinuate that it wouldn’t be better to have an unknown candidate than a disliked candidate.

        How could it be better to have a candidate that voters do not like, over a candidate that they haven’t come to an opinion on yet?

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yea, pretty much every election up here in Canada.

        I’m amazed that Americans think four months “is like literally no time”.

        It’d take an ad spend but the DNC could name recognition pretty much anyone at this point.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You don’t elect a chief executive in Canada the way we do in the U.S.

          You can’t compare a parliamentary election to our constitutional presidential republic’s elections.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The elections are short, but we’ve known the candidates a long time. De Dluca was elected leader shortly before the election and no one knew who he was and he totally tanked.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its not, last time we did this Reagan won by a fucking landslide. I am very nervous but voting D.

        • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          In 1980, Reagan beat an unpopular incumbent, Carter, by a huge margin. In 1984, Reagan was the incumbent and crushed Walter Mondale. I’m not sure which one is the, “last time we did this” though.

          If anything, Reagan shows us that unpopular incumbents do not have a high likelihood of reelection.

      • polonius-rex@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        can you show an election where somebody in the polling position of biden has come back to win it?

        non-us election cycles are shorter than the time that’s left i don’t think it’s an impossible hurdle

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t have to show evidence for a claim I did not make.

          You, however, made this claim: it’s better to have an unknown than a known candidate that people don’t like.

          Can you back it up with evidence or not?

          • polonius-rex@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            i think it’s weird that you think you’re allowed to infer claims from my position but that i’m not allowed to infer claims from yours

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I didn’t infer anything. You made a direct claim that you aren’t backing up. I quoted it. I have made no claims.

              • polonius-rex@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                you didn’t quote anything?

                please could you quote the exact words you believe i used to express “it’s better to have an unknown than a known candidate that people don’t like.”?

                thank you

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  that was the original statement Flying Squid was replying to before you joined in the thread, Squid just didn’t seem to notice that you’re not the same commenter.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            the commenter you’re replying to now isn’t the one who made that claim, and for some reason they aren’t speaking up to clarify that about themselves.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder if we would get this headline if the coup failed…

    Zero respect