• Stanard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        My first thought was “wait until they hear about Shakespeare”. Literally every role filled by men, sometimes with the script explicitly calling for a man to play a female in full attire.

        I’d also hate to see what policies they’ll enact for their chorale program when performing historical hymns, where soprano parts specifically called for a male eunuch (castrato) to sing since females were not allowed to attend church services including choirs.

        In my younger years I would have been absolutely vilified by these people. I’m probably vilified now, but I would’ve been then too. In all seriousness though, I cannot believe how far backwards we’ve gone in all this. I recognize that these thoughts and feelings have existed since before I was a kid but at least back then people seemed to have the decency to mind their own.

        But to attack theatre of all things with this gender bullshit is attacking theatre itself. Crossdressing in theatre has existed for as long as theatre has existed. Cross-singing has existed for as long as singing has existed. If they’re not teaching that stuff in their performing arts programs, they are denying young adults a quality education of the performing arts.

      • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        We banned ShakesSpear and hung him/her in effigy

        —Texas, probably

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is a slight difference when we’re talking about trans people.

      I’d wager they would allow a man to play a woman’s role and vice versa. I think this is purely the anti-trans agenda taking hold.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gotta say, their obsession with children’s genitalia really weirds me out.

      • Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Always comes down to that why care if the person is trans it’s like those laws that forbid trans people from hrt all bullshit

    • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some of the very first people that the Brownshirts went after was transpeople, even completely destroying an institute that was studying gender in the 30’s.

    • ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Just want to point out that this statement makes it very clear that the original decision was reactionary discrimination against a minority in the first place.

      Following the closed meeting, a board member, Wendy Vellotti, put forward the motion to reinstate the original version and cast of the production as it was before the gender rule was created.

      Edit: The school board is now launching an investigation into the actions of the superintendent.

      https://www.kxii.com/2023/11/14/sherman-isd-board-trustees-discuss-superintendent-position/

      • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        They need to investigate him. There are images circulating of him harassing parents who spoke ill of him about the situation. Another board member was shown to be protesting the local pride problem that was held, yelling at children and taunting them.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I haven’t seen Oklahoma! but is there a part where the lead whips out their dong and waves it in front of the audience?

    If not, who cares what’s in their pants?

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Shortly after Hightower’s casting, however, the student was replaced when the school’s principal, Scott Johnston, called Hightower’s father about a new gender policy for student performers.

    “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

    This sounds like the kind of thing a school would do under the Nazis. I wonder why that is.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 months ago

      What the fuck?

      “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

      When I was in school, they literally didn’t have enough students who were good enough to act, so there was so much gender bending. What garbage

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        During shakespeares time, they did not allow female actors, so all women on stage were played by men.

        Shakespeare had men acting in skirts and dresses. Juliet of Romeo and Juliet, a 14 year old girl was played by a man. The kissing between the Capulet heiress and the Montague boy were two men smooching on stage.

        Repugnicans are a plague on both your houses (of Parliament)!

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth,” Hightower recounted the conversation.

      These people are so fucking clueless. Men playing women in theatre is literally as old as theatre because women literally weren’t allowed to.

    • Case@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also how that spits in the face of theatrical performances dating at least back to Shakespeare’s time, if not further.

      I never studied that stuff, but I did date a drama major back in the day.

    • morgan423@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I bet if you asked him if he was a Bob’s Burgers fan, he’d say yes and not be bothered at all that two of the lead female characters are played by men.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Our culture” (mostly western European) does not care if men play women (or vice-versa) in a play. If anything, like other have mentioned, in condones it. Stop acting like what you believe is the arbiter of culture. What you believe is nothing and meaningless, and a minority in our society.

          Even if you were correct (which you absolutely are not), it wouldn’t matter because we don’t have to continue doing and believing the same things that were once believed. We can imagine and create a better world that let’s people be what they want and be happy. We don’t need you to agree to it, but it’d be better if you at least weren’t hostile to people trying to live their lives and not bothering you.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            we don’t have to continue doing and believing the same things that were once believed. We can imagine and create a better world that let’s people be what they want and be happy. We don’t need you to agree to it, but it’d be better if you at least weren’t hostile to people trying to live their lives and not bothering you.

            Wise words.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              So we should allow children to read books that are accepting of relationships at all, right? It’s either wrong to do or it isn’t. It shouldn’t matter what gender the people are in the relationships. Either you’re OK with some types of indoctrination or none.

              (I’m of the opinion it isn’t indoctrination to let people choose to read what they choose to read. It isn’t indoctrination to admit people exist.)

        • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then they can just, you know, “not expose their child to that lifestyle” and stop forcing other people to do what their theocracy says?

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          LGBT isn’t a choice and covering their eyes won’t change their sexual orientation.

          But, besides that point, how the fuck is it okay to insulate your kid from other cultures? That’s not healthy at all. Eating ramen wasn’t part of my family’s culture growing up, either, but I don’t go around trying to prevent children from learning about Japanese food.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You mean they do hate it but want to claim respectability points by gesturing to “muh kultor!”

          Queer folks are in every culture because they literally just happen everywhere. It ain’t up to some badnik lowdowns to decide it ain’t in their culture because it sure is when they’re kicking little johny on the street for not wanting to be called jessy anymore.

    • scripthook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I remember correctly back in the 18th century when only men were in plays they would also play women.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Actors and actresses could only play a role that was the same gender they were assigned at birth. Is just the next step, the Nazi’s have been coming for us but they weren’t you so you didn’t stand up.

      Over the last two years it was about fictional characters being played by people not of the characters race, and voice actors started losing work because they weren’t the same race as the characters being voiced.

      Before that it was wrong coloured fictional live action princesses.

      Before that it was wrong coloured actors using disguises and make-up.

      Before that it was black-face.

      And everyone thought, I’m not racist maybe that should be wrong! And now you’re racist, sexist, bigoted, for daring to have the admiration and respect to want to imitate ‘those people’. This is part of the culture war, they want to make sure you stay within your lines, on your rung, and in your place.

      FIRST THEY CAME
      By Martin Niemöller
      First they came for the Communists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Communist
      Then they came for the Socialists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Socialist
      Then they came for the trade unionists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a trade unionist
      Then they came for the Jews
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Jew
      Then they came for me
      And there was no one left
      To speak out for me.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I really don’t think enough people realize this shit leads to “women can’t wear pants,” (would fit the statutes they pass to ban drag) which inevitably rolls back nearly all progress we’ve made in the past century regarding women in the workplace.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Or gay and trans people not being allowed to portray men and women, or straight people from portraying gay or trans people.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            or keep straight people from portraying gay or trans people.

            Except no. If they were consistent, then yeah sure. But there’s nothing consistent about this ideology.

            They wouldn’t care about that. But more importantly, art containing gay or trans people is “degenerate,” and would never be made in the first place (or if made, its creators would be killed).

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not quite sure if I’m reading you right, but I’d say there’s a relevant difference between those examples, like recommending white people don’t act in blackface, which are about respecting the cultural sensitivities of a traditionally oppressed group, and those, like prohibiting trans kids from acting roles of their own gender, which are about enhancing the oppression of a traditionally oppressed group.

  • TheGIGAcapitalist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because Max identifies as a transgender male, he could no longer be cast as the male lead.

    I feel like the easy solution is to identify as a cis male…

    It is concerning (but unsurprising) how obsessed conservatives are with childrens genitals.

    • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You must cover your genitals at all times! But your coverings must clearly indicate which genitals you have! No one may see your genitals, but everyone needs to be clearly informed of your genitals at all times.

      Also the gential signaling coves change over time, but wearing the wrong coverings in the wrong time period is unnatural and makes God mad!

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can’t choose to identify as the cis version of your opposite sex.

      That’s literally why we have the term cis, to differentiate from those who keep their assigned gender from those who do not.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The cis kid who was cast to replace the trans kid should refuse on principle. the rest of the staff should, too.

    Also conservatives can go fuck themselves.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      8 months ago

      The cis kid who was cast to replace the trans kid should refuse on principle.

      The whole cast and backstage staff should pretend to go along with it until opening night, and then on opening night as the curtains open, they make a short statement about the injustice then walk off stage and go home.

      Alternatively, the cast should covertly learn the role of an opposite gender cast member. Then on opening night, the cast members assume their opposite role and perform the whole play ignoring the costume inconsistencies.

    • rynzcycle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      As a former theater kid (and queer person) this is close to the right answer. The cis replacement should show up on day 1 and do the most over the top, flaming, fabulous Curly the world has ever seen.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re right, it is a speck, so why the fuck is the school board singling out a child to punish over something completely insignificant? Do you think that child is going to grow up with a strong respect for authority, knowing that they will ruin their prospects over trivial bullshit?

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just because it doesn’t have an effect on you personally doesn’t mean it’s a speck. Other human beings exist and have feelings. Maybe stop being a narcissist.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      I highly doubt any lawsuit of this nature would be anything close to a slam dunk, especially in Texas. I’m not finding any federal court cases that provide legal precedent on the topic, and Trump revoked the Obama administration guidance that trans people are protected under Title IX.

          • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It would start in a state court and progress to the state level Supreme Court, I imagine. After that it goes to the federal SC. This would be preferable if they are seeking punitive damages.

            Or I guess they could appeal it to the federal level. This is the route if you wanted to make a precedent for the entire US.

  • troglodytis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is absolutely against theatre traditions.

    I was an angsty theatre kid. I would conspire to ruin every and any play for the remainder of my time at that school.

  • stephfinitely@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I hate conservative so much. This is a non issue. If they are the best for the part let them play the part.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’d think they would ban Oklahoma! in Texas entirely for daring to be about a state other than Texas.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    They do know that acting is pretending to be someone other than yourself, right?

    If Jared Leto (🤮) can win an Oscar for portraying a trans woman despite not being trans, then there is absolutely no reason that a trans boy can’t play the male lead of a school play. It’s acting.