• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Considering that Biden’s main competitor is an actual neonazi and the USA have an undemocratic election system that disadvantages all but two parties, there’s pretty much no choice but the senile grandpa who’s not a neonazi.

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      yeah like people keep saying that there is need for someone better than biden, but at the moment he’s the only option thst is valid. it’s about damage control not about making everything utopia.

      they complain that biden is not good enough, while completely ignoring that trump is literal neonazi. how in the fuck it is even question wheter you should vote for trump or biden because the fact is that either of them is going to the office. not some third candinate who would be actually good

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        As far as I can tell, his administration isn’t so bad overall (granted, compared to children in cages this is a low bar to cross). It’s not like he does every single job personally.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Still voting Biden, but this feels an awful lot like many past elections where people are holding their nose and voting for a candidate they don’t necessarily like just because they really don’t like the other candidate: Bush v Gore, Bush v Kerry, Clinton v Trump. Those elections never seem to turn out good.

    • squozenode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s exactly what this is.

      Give me a viable other option, please! Biden is soggy, cold oatmeal from 4 days ago that’s probably still fine. Trump is medical waste mixed with gasoline and uranium powder.

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fear seems like the go-to strategy when you have the weaker candidate. During the Obama elections, the only thing Republicans could do was try to scare people into voting for them, since they knew they couldn’t beat him. The strategy turns from focusing on the strength of your own candidate to focusing on the flaws of the opposing candidate. Democrats entire strategy at this point is maximizing fear of Trump. Not sure why it’s so hard for them to get rid of Biden and put up a real candidate, but it looks like a flaw in the nomination process.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biden loses

    OP blames the 5 tankies actually living in the USA for voting 3rd party

        • Hoomod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They should have been preparing a replacement for Biden since he was sworn into office.

          Now… Who really knows. There’s so much at stake for more than the presidency. If the choices are between a 78 year old felon under multiple indictments who is only out for himself, and an 81 year old who wants to better the country but is, well, 81… I’ll take the 81 year old

          • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thank you for your ableism

            And no, the ‘problem’ is always people didn’t vote for their shit candidates & not that they ran a shit candidate.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Íf he wore a clown suit and only spoke Pig-Latin during the debate… considering the alternative

    He would STILL be the only viable candidate worth voting for

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think the real upsetting thing isn’t Biden’s performance, or having Biden as president for four more years. He achieved quite a bit after all. The real upsetting thing is the DNC being such cunts that they even pushed for this debate, hoping that Biden could win, only to deny and ignore Biden’s abhorrent performance immediately after. That Bernie got shafted twice by them, that is the really upsetting part.

    • whocares314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It seems pretty obvious to me at this point that the DNC would rather lose than have an actual progressive win. None of the shitty things that Trump wants to do will hurt them, (stupid take if they cared at all about their descendants but they’re either too arrogant or too ignorant to worry about that) but actual progressive policies that helped average people WOULD hurt their way of life. Marginally. Like, the tiniest little amount. Like, your yacht can only have one master bedroom instead of four. But why give that up when you don’t have to?

      “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it”

      I’m voting for Biden though, and I’ll keep voting as progressively as possible in the down ballot elections. If a progressive movement from the bottom up can start by doing things like getting rid of FPTP, we still have a chance. And to anyone thinking about not voting, please do. The president is one person. They are the single most powerful person individually, (taking aside impact on the judicial system) but the collective impact on your day to day life is far more influenced by down ballot positions. Research your down ballot candidates and vote. Many of those races are decided by only a handful of votes. Yours matters.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        It seems pretty obvious to me at this point that the DNC would rather lose than have an actual progressive win.

        It’s not in their interests to let a progressive win. Just like their counterpart, the DNC takes a shit ton of bribery donations from corporations lobbyists. Bringing in a progressive who would reform the system or push back against pro-corporate policies is biting the hands that feed them.

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well when the only other vote is fascism, hate, and bullying… Yeah we’re gonna vote for the not ridiculous choice.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah… sure. Not a tankie, I’m European and don’t care about influencing you to vote for one or another. But after seeing Biden “debate” Trump I know the dems are fucked. I mean sure, still go out and vote, but I honestly don’t see many people doing so.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Dems are intentionally throwing it. It’s the only thing that makes sense at this point. The “Not Trump” donations are lucrative, and there’s no way the R’s will make insider trading illegal.

      This might be the spark we need for a legitimate progressive party though. Or we get a civil war, who knows.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s honestly extremely sad that the primary requirement to be a leader is “ability to speak perfectly on stage for 2 hours.”

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It should be a basic requirement of literally any public office. That fact that we have got this far baffles me utterly.

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah it’s not great, but like… coming across as coherent is important no matter the position. Biden kinda failed that basic competency test, probably just due to his age and not like, stupidity or a personal failing of any kind. I’m still voting for Biden, but yeah it’s not exactly an enthusiastic vote.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean the alternative is literally fascism. Not the silly internet “fascism” that’s just about someone that disagrees with you that you perceive is right of you on some silly made up political spectrum. Actual full blown fascism.

      So yeah you need to vote for Joe Biden.

  • bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, some ppl don’t get that you don’t have to like Biden, to vote against trump. 🤷‍♂️

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You mean you don’t have to like Kamala? I’m voting Kamala.

      Not fond of her, but she’ll do better than Trump by leagues and miles and make history while not rocking the boat or affecting any meaningful change. Libs will love her, she’ll be a democrat party darling. I bet she gets a second term.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m voting against Trump. Not thrilled to have a president who might have to have his Oval Office relocated to a nursing home.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t expect either to last 4 more years. Especially Trump.

      If Trump does win and dies while destroying the world, imagine what younger dictator would follow…

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d vote for ToS era Pike over Trump. I’d vote for a candidate who only communicates via ouija board over Trump. I’d vote to not have a president for 4 years before I’d vote for Trump.

    It’s crazy that Trump can get convicted of fraud, be found liable for sexual assault, promise to abuse presidential power to get revenge against those who cross him, actively undermine both national and global security, promise to round up millions and put them into camps, attempt to overthrow the election and refuse to not try it again, and so on, and his side is still so loyal they’ll wear solidarity diapers for him.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m so down for ouija board prez.

      Ouija board prez ‘channeling’ FDR: T-A-X-T-H-E-R-I-C-H-Goodbye

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d vote to not have a president for 4 years before I’d vote for Trump.

      And now I’m curious how many things depend on having a president at all, and what his role is, by design, in the US and other countries.

      • Atom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cabinet and federal appointments are the big thing. That’s why I’ll take Biden over Trump. I’m not just voting for him, I’m voting for the 4000 jobs in energy, health, labor, transportation, etc. to be run by Democrats, liberals, and qualified people.

        Trump, and project 2025 plan to fill all those roles with right wing nutjobs who will do anything to please the right. On top of those 4000, they’d expand the presidential appointment power to fire up to 45% of the federal workforce. Meteorologist who said the hurricane won’t hit Alabama? GONE! Doctor who said injecting bleach was a bad idea? FIRED!

        I’ll take anyone who won’t put Project 2025 in motion.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe they can settle for one of those wheelchair computers that tracks your eyes looking at the letters.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Might be a cool (edit: or probably cringy, given current democrats) meme campaign, listing all the things that are better than Trump one by one. You could have a new one every day until the election day easily.

    • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I live in Canada, 15 km from the US border. When shit kicks off down there millions of them could come north expecting that Canada will welcome them with open arms. We will be unable to feed or house them. Many will die of exposure in the first winter. They should go south and hope that Mexico will take them in.

      • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s actually the other way around. Things are getting so bad in Canada that emigration to the US is at a 10 year high

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m not sure if you completely missed my point or if hating Canada is so big a part of your identity now that you just can’t miss any opportunity to spread that Rusian and Chinese anti-Canadian propaganda.

          EDIT: 7 day old propaganda drone account.

          • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            “everything I don’t like is propaganda” - Typical Lemmy user

            No, what I said is true. You’re Canadian, how do you not know this?

            Source: CBC

            Tens of thousands of Canadians are emigrating from Canada to the United States and the number of people packing up and moving south has hit a level not seen in 10 years or more, according to data compiled by CBC News.

            There’s nothing new about Canadians moving south of the 49th parallel for love, work or warmer weather, but the latest figures from the American Community Survey (ACS) suggest it’s now happening at a much higher rate than the historical average.

            http://cbc.ca/news/politics/canadians-moving-to-the-us-hits-10-year-high-1.7218479

            Actual reasons cited in the article: Lower taxes, higher wages, affordable housing, dislike of Trudeau’s politics, cheaper groceries, increasing crime rates, increasingly disappointing healthcare system, and warm weather

            Whether you agree or disagree with these reasons is irrelevant. The point is that trend is there and it’s accelerating. So to your tongue in cheek point about Americans mass migrating north, that likely won’t happen because the opposite trend is occurring as we speak.

            • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nice straw man. Typical propagandist.

              Cost of Living in United States is 8.6% higher than in Canada (without rent)

              Cost of Living Including Rent in United States is 14.1% higher than in Canada

              Rent Prices in United States are 26.0% higher than in Canada

              Restaurant Prices in United States are 8.7% higher than in Canada

              Groceries Prices in United States are 5.2% higher than in Canada

              But by all means, go on spreading your propaganda.

              • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not arguing for or against, I’m just pointing out the fact that emigration trend from Canada to the US is happening and it is at a 10 year high. I merely pointed out the reasons cited in the article as I clearly stated.

                • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I live in Canada but have worked for US companies and worked internationally for 15 years. I would never, ever move to the US. Ever.

                  My belief is that the people moving to the US are moving there for, “freedumb” (no realizing that Canadians enjoy more actual freedom and have better protection of their rights than Americans do) I’m more than ok with that.

      • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        As someone living around the Timmins area, we’ve imported some hot climate individuals and still have room, send them up! The Northlander should be running by then /fingers crossed/

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    What I’ve seen so many people not understand with the situation we are in right now, is that we can’t fix our current situation in one election. Everything is far to tucked up for that, so the best that can be done is vote for the least fucked up option and work to improve things. People refusing to participate or vote for the candidate who is unfortunately our best option currently (biden) are doing more damage than the people voting for the fascist party. The perfect candidate/option does not exist and never will (obviously not saying everything biden has done has been good).

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      People do understand that concept, but it’s literally what Democrats have been doing for the past 40 years and it has put us right here where we are right now. The “lesser of two evils” thing just has no propellant left, no one is buying that line anymore. Neoliberalism needs to go before Democrats can start winning again.

      You need to understand that people have been saying “just put the neolibs in power again and we’ll work to improve things” every election cycle, and now we are closer to fascism than we’ve literally ever been. You at least understand why people see that strategy as a failure, right? Like, you understand why no one believes it anymore?

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        A vote for neoliberals is a vote to not have fascism for four more years. America’s voting system doesn’t allow the never-have-fascism votes to be pooled with the delay-fascism votes, so unless there’s a decent chance for a mass swing of voters from delay-fascism to never-have-fascism, trying to encourage a small-scale swing only makes immediate fascism more likely by weakening the only thing with a chance to delay it.

        If the plan is to try and encourage the Democrats to have primaries that actually have the power to move the party left, now is not the time to withhold a vote in protest as there’s a good chance that even if it did convince them, there’d never be another election that wasn’t rigged so they’d lose it no matter how popular they were.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          A vote for neoliberals is a vote to not have fascism for four more years.

          That’s an extremely hard case to make at this point though when the “not” fascist guy is funding a genocide and refusing to entertain the measures we’d need to take to actually take the fight to the fascists (ex. Championing an effort to pack the supreme court). Neoliberals are not truly acting like democracy is on the line, they say it a lot but it’s not what their actions communicate, which makes it difficult to believe they’d ever stop obstructing progress.

          Neoliberals don’t stop or stall fascists by getting into power – they just soft sell it and give the general public time to acclimate to the slipping of the Overton window. They do this in service of corporate interests rather than theocracy the way the far-right does but it ends us up in the same place.

          If the plan is to try and encourage the Democrats to have primaries that actually have the power to move the party left, now is not the time to withhold a vote in protest as there’s a good chance that even if it did convince them, there’d never be another election that wasn’t rigged so they’d lose it no matter how popular they were.

          Now is the time that the Democratic establishment chooses to try to strong arm the left into voting for them, they do this every election; claim the sky is falling and that we must vote for them or else. So I guess my view is, if they have assessed that they can risk playing a game of chicken, so can voters.

          I understand Project 2025 and its seriousness, but that problem is going to be there every election from here until such a time that the GOP dissolves. I’m skeptical that 4 years will allow them to achieve everything they want to without sweeping the house and senate too. The president cannot legally be crowned king, and if they try to do that perhaps that is what it will take to actually radicalize the self-sedated upper middle-class liberals and political fence-sitters.

          I’m sick of defensive leadership, and any offensive needs to start with attacking the Democratic structure that’s making the party so ineffectual and complicit. More time is not enough in my opinion, people were talking about GOP plans to capture the supreme court as far back as Bush Jr. and giving Democrats wins achieved nothing. They need to be forced to take it seriously and I just don’t see that happening without some pain (for them and, unfortunately, us).

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Forget a perfect candidate. Just go back and watch the 2012 debate and both Obama and Mitt Romney were infinitely better than Joe Biden or Trump.

      • NormalPerson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But they never told me which of them was the better golfer.

        God it feels stupid to write that and it being an actual argument during a presidential debate.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      are doing more damage than the people voting for the fascist party.

      Hooooooly fuck this gets 27 upvotes? There it is folks. Leftists are doing more damage by refusing to vote than the people who stormed the capitol. This hot take brought to you by lemmy.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The Republican party wouldn’t exist if everybody voted. That is a straight up fact. As fucked as our election system is, they are far enough the minority that if everyone got out, the EC wouldn’t matter.

        You want a “left light” and a “true left”, you aren’t going to get it by abstaining, or by voting for nonviable moonshot third-party candidates. You are going to get it by abolishing the far right party and making that tiny sliver of the whole population realize that their antiquated views aren’t welcome here.

        They need to be crushed.

        They only exist because people don’t want to vote for the lesser of two evils, so instead they just don’t vote. And what do you know, a -1 for the less evil is just as effective as a +1 for the more evil.

        All of their success is brought on by feeding apathy in their opposition, making it more difficult to vote, destroying any faith in the system, and gerrymandering.

        So yes, in my opinion, the far left refusing to hold their nose for a few minutes may as well be voting for the insurrectionist.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So this happened under Obama. People voted blue no matter who, gave Dems a super majority and they used it to pass a GOP-crafted bill that forced people to pay for useless private insurance.

          The party itself needs to change and the types of candidates that the establishment supports needs to change. That doesn’t happen when they can do their pied piper thing and keep winning. And no “just one last hit” won’t let them overcome the addiction to corporate conservativism.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They need to be crushed.

          Then the way to do that is find a candidate in the primaries who appeals to everyone you need to make that happen. It was never a secret Biden was not that person.

          It’s a free country though. Feel free to go with whatever pitiful strategy you want. But you won’t get the pro-corporate genocide supporting brain dead geriatric with my help. Let me know when you’re ready to negotiate.

          • ProIsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            And if the Republicans get power this time around with a plan to remove all of our rights to hold even fair elections (project 2025) there won’t be any negotiating. I’m a white cis male and it seems like you are too. We’ll be fine either way. It’s minorities and vulnerable classes that will get hit the most, like always. Women lost rights this last time around, it worries me how much more worse it will get.

            Do I want Joe? Hell no, but I’ll vote D for the rest of my days and walk through glass to do it. Once there’s no more Rs then we can argue between Joe Biden and AOC. Still ain’t perfect but a lot better than what we have.

            It’s a free country for now, feel free to sit this one out.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              And if the Republicans get power this time around with a plan to remove all of our rights to hold even fair elections (project 2025) there won’t be any negotiating.

              Sounds like the 2020 primaries were pretty important.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        1000 people stormed the capitol. Allowing trump to win is far far far worse. Federal judge appointments alone are worth far more.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, Hillary and the DNC allowed Trump to win by ignoring their base and chasing imaginary “swing” voters. And now they’re doing it again.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      so the best that can be done is vote for the least fucked up option and work to improve things.

      Democrats were good at the first part, but not the second. I remember lots of Dems saying “Vote for Biden, and then we’ll hold his feet to the fire!” Well, there was no “holding his feet to the fire”, because that’s seen as enabling Trump.

      The perfect candidate/option does not exist and never will

      Yes, but there are candidates who are better, such as Jill Stein and Cornel West. You can’t vote for a perfect candidate, but you can vote for the best candidate.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You might as well vote for Barney the dinosaur for all the good it will do.

        A vote for a candidate who cannot win is wasted.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          A vote for a candidate who cannot win is wasted.

          Then it sounds like moderates need to be convinced a vote for a pro-corporate, genocide supporting, establishment geriatric is a waste of a vote.

          • Freefall@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            wait, that is both of them! So, the felon adulterer serial liar narcissist one or the one that is older by two years and doesn’t know where he is or what he is saying sometimes?

            • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Right? Everything you can say negative about Biden can be said about Trump and Trump will be the worse offender of the two. Biden does have positive qualities, which I honestly cannot think can be said about Trump. He is a sushi roll consisting entirely of turd.

              • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                And you are happily imprisoning yourself into believing that the system is right to only offer you these two as candidates. If everyone that was progressive and unhappy with Biden would vote for Stein, then she could win. It is the mere talk about her having no chance of winning and the vote being wasted that keeps people in line to take the system as is.

                I see the same arguments made against voting for smaller parties in my country where there is a minimum % they need to achieve before getting parliament seats. It is a system designed to preserve the current political elites with their network to the economic and cultural elites against ideas and movements taking a foothold.

                Everyone sees what Biden is and what he stands for. If everyone who disagrees with that would take to the streets and demand the DNC to hold a real primary, or better yet demand fundamental changes to the political system, you would be surprised what is possible.

    • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Biden is simply not our best option.

      What exactly makes a geriatric 81 year old the most fit person for the job?

      There is plenty of time to get a new candidate.

    • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not having enough time and voting for the least fucked candidate is old and tired. How long do we vote for the Turd over the Douche instead of voting for someone that we actually believe in?

      Also, I can’t justify genocide.